1976
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9422(76)85110-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteinbiosynthesen in dormanten und nachgereiften embryonen und samen von Agrostemma githago

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dormancy was originally thought to be maintained by the global repression of transcription or translation, thus preventing germination or growth in response to favorable environmental conditions. However, comparisons of total protein (Chen and Varner 1970, Cuming and Osborne 1978, Hecker and Bernhardt 1976, Stafstrom and Sussex 1988 and nucleic acid (Jarvis and Shannon 1981, Slater andBryant 1987) biosynthetic levels in dormant and nondorinant fissues have generally failed to support Received 5 October, 1992;revised 22 February, 1993 14-Fhysioi. Planl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dormancy was originally thought to be maintained by the global repression of transcription or translation, thus preventing germination or growth in response to favorable environmental conditions. However, comparisons of total protein (Chen and Varner 1970, Cuming and Osborne 1978, Hecker and Bernhardt 1976, Stafstrom and Sussex 1988 and nucleic acid (Jarvis and Shannon 1981, Slater andBryant 1987) biosynthetic levels in dormant and nondorinant fissues have generally failed to support Received 5 October, 1992;revised 22 February, 1993 14-Fhysioi. Planl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in activated cell cultures (29), the rate of protein synthesis was also found to increase during the lag phase between the induction and the onset of growth. The discrepancies with other reports on Agrostemma (18) and on seeds with the same type of dormancy (9,19,20) can be traced back to the pitfalls listed in the Introduction. When dormancy in D seeds was broken by imbibition at 4C, protein synthesis did not remain at a constant level after the initial increase but increased continuously just as in A seeds (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This demonstrates that in A Agrostemma seeds the low water content does not affect the protein-synthesizing machinery. The lower incorporation in A embryos during the first hours of imbibition may be due to damage of the protein-synthesizing machinery during the 1 year air-dry storage as suggested by Hecker and Bernhardt (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation