2013
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra21830e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteinadsorption behavior in batch and competitive conditions with nanoparticle surface imprinting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends have been attained for previous SDVGs [54]. These similar kinetic fashions are possibly due to a saturation of binding sites of biomaterials [55][56][57] or the combination effects of hydrophilicity, size, charge, stability, rigidity, texture, and availability of binding sites of the protein-biomaterial system [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar trends have been attained for previous SDVGs [54]. These similar kinetic fashions are possibly due to a saturation of binding sites of biomaterials [55][56][57] or the combination effects of hydrophilicity, size, charge, stability, rigidity, texture, and availability of binding sites of the protein-biomaterial system [58].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These kinetic patterns on different surfaces have been seen and reported frequently in the literature for proteins [36][37][38] and platelets. 39 Potentially, modification of surface Mercado-Pagán et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Step 4: rebinding through recognition by functional pores. Turner et al, 2006;Bossi et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2008;Uysal et al, 2008;Hua et al, 2009;Whitcombe et al, 2011;Sankarakumar and Tong, 2013;, and in the succeeding texts, we formalize their effect. Functional group distribution was also suggested as a contributor to protein selectivity (Kimhi and Bianco-Peled, 2007;Gai et al, 2010;Levi and Srebnik, 2011;Zayats et al, 2011;Lan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AR and SR were estimated, as described later. MW (Pang et al ., ; Odabaşi et al ., ; Çimen et al ., ; Pan et al ., ) and IEP (Pan et al ., ; El‐Sharif et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ) have already been suggested as possible explanations for observed PIP selectivity in an ad hoc manner in the literature (Bossi et al ., ; Turner et al ., ; Bossi et al ., ; Chen et al ., ; Uysal et al ., ; Hua et al ., ; Whitcombe et al ., ; Sankarakumar and Tong, ; Li et al ., 2014), and in the succeeding texts, we formalize their effect. Functional group distribution was also suggested as a contributor to protein selectivity (Kimhi and Bianco‐Peled, ; Gai et al ., ; Levi and Srebnik, ; Zayats et al ., ; Lan et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%