2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.651703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase and Kinase Specificity in Regulation of SRC and Breast Tumor Kinase*

Abstract: Background:The view that, unlike kinases, phosphatases are "nonspecific" pervades the field. Results: PTP1B inhibited BRK by dephosphorylating Tyr-342, but activated SRC by antagonizing PAG-dependent inhibition by CSK. Conclusion: Signaling is regulated by combinatorial effects of PTKs and PTPs, with both enzyme classes displaying exquisite specificity. Significance: Defining phosphatase substrate specificity will reveal new, more effective strategies for therapeutic intervention in major human diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, upon down-regulation, the activation loop of MET is dephosphorylated and inactivated by an ER-anchored protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTP1B. Interestingly, we reported previously that there was a decrease in expression of PTP1B in all 11 tested ovarian cancer cell lines compared with the two normal controls (Fan et al 2013(Fan et al , 2015, further supporting the idea that MET-dependent signals may be augmented at the level of both enhanced phosphorylation and activation as well as attenuated dephosphorylation and inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, upon down-regulation, the activation loop of MET is dephosphorylated and inactivated by an ER-anchored protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTP1B. Interestingly, we reported previously that there was a decrease in expression of PTP1B in all 11 tested ovarian cancer cell lines compared with the two normal controls (Fan et al 2013(Fan et al , 2015, further supporting the idea that MET-dependent signals may be augmented at the level of both enhanced phosphorylation and activation as well as attenuated dephosphorylation and inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Detailed protocols are described in Fan et al (2015). The shRNAs used were FER shRNA#1 seq (5 ′ -GCAGAAAGTTTGC AAGTAATG-3 ′ ) and FER shRNA#2 seq (5 ′ -GCCAAGGAAC GATACGACAAA-3 ′ )siRNAs targeting MET were purchased from Sigma: MET siRNA1 (SASI_Hs01_00133002) and siRNA12 (SASI_WI_00000001).…”
Section: Rnaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation can resolve lipid raft and cytosol fractions. As expected, PAG, a marker protein for lipid rafts [20, 21], was detected in the early fractions, whereas the cytosolic proteins BRK and PLCγ1 [22] were both detected in later fractions (Fig 4A). FER and MET, which displayed a similar distribution, were detected in later fractions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It is noted that Exon5 encodes residues from 119 to 164 so that the ΔE5 mutant lacks Lys120, implying that this mutant may be somewhat defective in binding specific substrates such as Src. However, recently, Fan et al reported that PTP1B potentiated Src activity indirectly via dephosphorylation of CBP/PAG with concomitant disruption of its association with CSK [21]. The mechanism by which PTP1B activates Src is more complicated than is currently believed, and more studies with PTP1B and the ΔE5 PTP1B mutant isoform are needed to clarify the relationship between PTP1B and Src activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%