“…Therefore, it is possible that the nominal associations observed between SNPs in block 1 and insulin sensitivity in Pima Indians represent false associations due to multiple testing, rather than independent confirmation that this gene has a role in insulin action. Palmer et al also detected two SNPs (rs4811077 and Only non-diabetic subjects were used in this analysis p values were calculated under the additive model and were adjusted for: a age, sex and family membership b age, sex, per cent body fat and family membership c age, sex, per cent body fat, glucose disposal rate, 30-min glucose levels and family membership; analysis for 30-min insulin was done only in normal glucose tolerant subjects, n=186 d age, sex, per cent body fat, glucose disposal rate and family membership; analysis for acute insulin response was done only in normal glucose tolerant subjects, n (female/male): 1/1, 74 (17/57); 1/2, 91 (36/55); 2/2, 21 (8/13) EMBS, estimated metabolic body size [4] d SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes in white subjects [2] e SNPs associated with insulin sensitivity in Hispanic Americans [3] f SNPs associated with fasting glucose levels in Hispanic Americans [3] g SNPs associated with insulin sensitivity in female white twins [5] h SNPs associated with fasting insulin levels and glucose disappearance in white subjects from the HERITAGE Family study [11] i SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes in the Danish population [12] 1484insG) that were associated with the acute insulin response (AIR) [3], while Ukkola et al detected a single SNP (rs968701) that was associated with the AIR in white subjects [11]. None of the SNPs was associated with an AIR among 186 full-heritage Pima Indians with normal glucose tolerance (data shown for rs4811074 in Table 2).…”