2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein to carbohydrate (P/C) ratio changes in microbial extracellular polymeric substances induced by oil and Corexit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of proteins to carbohydrates of EPS (P/C) has been found to be closely related to the ‘stickiness’ of EPS and their relative hydrophobicity. For example, the P/C ratio is related to aggregation propensity, e.g., [ 20 ], surface tension [ 21 ], presence of nano-plastics or oil in microbial cultures [ 19 , 31 ], light-induced chemical crosslinking [ 23 ], and, when mineral matter is present, the sedimentation efficiency of marine snow [ 24 ]. Figure 1 shows some examples of how these properties can be related to the P/C ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of proteins to carbohydrates of EPS (P/C) has been found to be closely related to the ‘stickiness’ of EPS and their relative hydrophobicity. For example, the P/C ratio is related to aggregation propensity, e.g., [ 20 ], surface tension [ 21 ], presence of nano-plastics or oil in microbial cultures [ 19 , 31 ], light-induced chemical crosslinking [ 23 ], and, when mineral matter is present, the sedimentation efficiency of marine snow [ 24 ]. Figure 1 shows some examples of how these properties can be related to the P/C ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P/C ratios for the colloidal EPS were generally higher (2.0–2.9) than those in the particulate EPS (1.18–2.54), suggesting the material released by the cells was stickier than that associated with the cells. These have previously been referred to as “unattached” versus “attached” EPS [ 11 , 62 ] and typically have different P/C ratios depending on the phase of the cells growth cycle and the stresses upon the cells [ 29 , 74 , 75 , 76 ]. Again, there were no significant differences due to OA; only the oil and oil plus dispersant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dispersants also cause microbes to alter both EPS abundance and composition (e.g., protein-carbohydrate ratio; Xu et al, 2018aXu et al, ,b, 2019. Proteinrich/hydrophobic EPS shows more resistance to dispersion and can facilitate MOS formation due to their high stickiness (Chiu et al, 2019;Santschi et al, 2020;Shiu et al, 2020). Therefore, MOS formation appears to be dependent on the relative strength of opposing mechanisms (e.g., microgel destabilization and TEP dispersion vs. changes in EPS release; Figure 2).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%