To test whether the structure of a protein is determined in a manner akin to the assembly of a jigsaw puzzle, up to 10 adjacent residues within the core of T4 lysozyme were replaced by methionine. Such variants are active and fold cooperatively with progressively reduced stability. The structure of a seven-methionine variant has been shown, crystallographically, to be similar to wild type and to maintain a well ordered core. The interaction between the core residues is, therefore, not strictly comparable with the precise spatial complementarity of the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Rather, a certain amount of give and take in forming the core structure is permitted. A simplified hydrophobic core sequence, imposed without genetic selection or computer-based design, is sufficient to retain native properties in a globular protein.The cores of globular proteins consist of buried, primarily hydrophobic, amino acids. Tight packing of the amino acid side chains (1) has led to the idea that the size and shape of the nonpolar amino acids within the core may constrain or define the overall protein fold (2, 3). This "jigsaw puzzle" model of protein folding was originally introduced by Crick (4) as a "knobs into holes" description of a-helix packing and has been elaborated by Chothia et al. (5), and by Alber and co-workers (6). Here the jigsaw puzzle model refers to shape complementarity (3), not to the pathway of folding (7). The model is supported by the observation that changes in the sizes and shapes of residues within the cores of proteins are usually destabilizing (8-10). Also in support of the model, the structures of a-helical coiled coils appear to be determined by the shapes of the buried side chains (6). In contrast with this view, it has been shown that alternative core sequences that lead to viable proteins could be selected by random mutagenesis for both A-repressor (11) and T4 lysozyme (12), among others (13,14). It is possible, however, that a limited number of combinations of amino acids are viable and that they are the ones identified by the mutagenic selection. Here we explore an approach in which there is no selection other than the sites of substitution.
MATERIALS AND METHODSWe chose methionine as a generic core-replacement residue for a combination of reasons. First, a methionine side chain occupies roughly the same volume as the frequently observed core residues leucine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine. It is, however, more flexible and can more readily adapt to occupy whatever space might be available. In this sense methionine contrasts with the rigid, predetermined shape of a piece of a jigsaw puzzle. Methionine also occurs relatively infrequently in known proteins (15). Thus multiple methionine substitutions would be expected to substantially change the composition of the core. Finally, we wondered if the intro-