2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.03.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Structure Prediction and Design in a Biologically Realistic Implicit Membrane

Abstract: Protein design is a powerful tool for elucidating mechanisms of function and engineering new therapeutics and nanotechnologies. Although soluble protein design has advanced, membrane protein design remains challenging because of difficulties in modeling the lipid bilayer. In this work, we developed an implicit approach that captures the anisotropic structure, shape of water-filled pores, and nanoscale dimensions of membranes with different lipid compositions. The model improves performance in computational ben… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would require extra effort to develop a scoring function that accounts for protein–lipid interactions. Such membrane-specific scoring functions have been already shown appropriate for membrane protein structure prediction and design purposes 45 and might also represent a significant advance for membrane-associated protein docking protocols. Looking ahead, a larger benchmark set will enable broader energy function development and optimization, which should eventually cover protein–lipid interactions too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would require extra effort to develop a scoring function that accounts for protein–lipid interactions. Such membrane-specific scoring functions have been already shown appropriate for membrane protein structure prediction and design purposes 45 and might also represent a significant advance for membrane-associated protein docking protocols. Looking ahead, a larger benchmark set will enable broader energy function development and optimization, which should eventually cover protein–lipid interactions too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results should improve the speed and accuracy of membrane protein structure prediction and design algorithms. [43][44][45] As membrane proteins account for over half of all therapeutic drug targets, 46 having accurate force fields to describe membrane protein energetics is essential. This simple, linear function / 01 (=) could be adapted to implicit membrane models or could alternatively be applied explicitly in systems such that a local value of / 01 to be calculated over water concentrations ranging from millimolar to 30 molar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed structural model optimizations were performed with three different combinations of scoring functions based on previous work (Kellogg, Leaver-Fay, & Baker, 2011), including "hard-hard", indicating that both side chain optimization and structure minimization were performed with default van der Waals repulsion term in the Rosetta scorefunction, "soft-soft" indicating that for both steps, a different scorefunction was used that has dampened van der Waals repulsion (in this case, the backbone was entirely prevented from moving during minimization), and "soft-hard" indicating that the soft-repulsive score function was used for side chain rotamer optimization, while the hard-repulsive scorefunction was used for energy minimization. The scorefunctions used were REF2015 (Alford et al, 2017) and REF2015_soft (Kellogg et al, 2011) for soluble proteins, and franklin2019 (Alford, Fleming, Fleming, & Gray, 2020) for integral membrane proteins (with a dampened van der Waals repulsion weight in the case of soft repulsion).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%