2006
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein–RNA interactions: exploring binding patterns with a three-dimensional superposition analysis of high resolution structures

Abstract: The program ENTANGLE is available from http://www.bioc.rice.edu/~shamoo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
118
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
118
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4). 35 In pltA RNA, the G9 interaction with RsmE additionally strengthens the contacts of the neighboring residues with RsmE ( Table 3). Indeed, the SELEX consensus sequence RUA CAR GGA UGU (28) reflects a preference for G or A (= R) over U or C at position 9, albeit in a hexaloop configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). 35 In pltA RNA, the G9 interaction with RsmE additionally strengthens the contacts of the neighboring residues with RsmE ( Table 3). Indeed, the SELEX consensus sequence RUA CAR GGA UGU (28) reflects a preference for G or A (= R) over U or C at position 9, albeit in a hexaloop configuration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…10 We ran molecular dynamics simulations of the complexes and analyzed the RNA-protein interactions found in the resulting conformations with the Entangle program. 35 We also estimated the theoretical binding free energy (ΔG) using the structures obtained by molecular dynamics simulations with the Molecular Mechanics -Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA) method. This method allows decomposing the binding free energy into residue contributions and provides insight into the origin of binding ( Table 3).…”
Section: Rna Pentaloop Structures As Effective Targets Of Regulators mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, atomic studies performed on protein-RNA complex structures have shown that histidine has a strong tendency to interact with nucleotides (Jeong et al, 2003). As for the exact type of interactions, these may include (i) hydrogen-bonding between H-donor (NtH) and H-acceptor (Np) atoms in the non-protonated histidine with base edges; (ii) ring stacking/hydrophobic interactions and (iii) water-mediated hydrogen bonds (Hoffman et al, 2004;Morozova et al, 2006). Thus, and considering the fact that at the working pH (7.0), histidine (pK a ¼ 6.5) is not significantly protonated (Ö zkara et al, 2002;Pitiot and Vijayalakshmi, 2002) the elution of sRNA when salt concentration is decreased suggests that ring stacking/ hydrophobic interactions and histidine-RNA direct hydrogenbonding are the dominant effects.…”
Section: Chromatographic Separation Of Srna 6smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermolecular contacts present in protein-RNA complexes can be assessed by specific programs such as NUCPLOT [350] or ENTANGLE [351]. Both programs read a coordinate file of a protein-nucleic acid complex in PDB format and identify intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen-bonding and stacking interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%