2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10930-021-10031-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein–Protein Docking: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract: The biological significance of proteins attracted the scientific community in exploring their characteristics. The studies shed light on the interaction patterns and functions of proteins in a living body. Due to their practical difficulties, reliable experimental techniques pave the way for introducing computational methods in the interaction prediction. Automated methods reduced the difficulties but could not yet replace experimental studies as the field is still evolving. Interaction prediction problem bein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
(185 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different approaches to studying and predicting PPIs [20]. Experimental techniques are reliable for detecting structures of small proteins or single monomers, but they have intrinsic limits regarding protein complexes (see, e.g., [21,22]) and are timeand resource-intensive [23]. To overcome these limitations, computational methods to predict 3D protein complexes and the corresponding PPIs have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different approaches to studying and predicting PPIs [20]. Experimental techniques are reliable for detecting structures of small proteins or single monomers, but they have intrinsic limits regarding protein complexes (see, e.g., [21,22]) and are timeand resource-intensive [23]. To overcome these limitations, computational methods to predict 3D protein complexes and the corresponding PPIs have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different approaches to studying and predicting PPIs [20]. Experimental techniques are reliable for detecting structures of small proteins or single monomers, but they have intrinsic limits regarding protein complexes (see, e.g., [21, 22]) and are time- and resource-intensive [23]. To overcome these limitations, com-putational methods to predict 3D protein complexes and the corresponding PPIs have been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, com-putational methods to predict 3D protein complexes and the corresponding PPIs have been developed. Many current methods rely on machine learning and can be classified into one of two groups based on the available input: template-free and template-based approaches [23]. Template-free methods provide predictions based on the peptide sequence only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scoring protein-protein docking poses is another important task in studying protein-protein interaction. Various criteria [16] have been proposed, such as force-field based criteria [17, 18], knowledge-based criteria [19, 20], and machine learning-based criteria [21]. Since the side chains of the residues, especially those located at the interface, are crucial for protein-protein interaction, a scoring term that is mainly based on side chains may be an effective term for better scoring the protein-protein docking poses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%