2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein phosphorylation and membrane association of sucrose synthase in developing tomato fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the in vitro phosphorylation of the ZmSUS1 protein in maize, belonging to group I-2, was found to cause the release of SUS from the membrane fraction (Winter et al, 1997). In the developing tomato fruit, the subcellular localization of SUS isoforms has also been found to be developmentally controlled, the membrane form being specifically detected in actively growing fruits, depending on the phosphorylation of SUS proteins (Anguenot et al, 2006). It will thus be interesting to determine whether the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of OsSUS5 and OsSUS7 alters their subcellular localization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the in vitro phosphorylation of the ZmSUS1 protein in maize, belonging to group I-2, was found to cause the release of SUS from the membrane fraction (Winter et al, 1997). In the developing tomato fruit, the subcellular localization of SUS isoforms has also been found to be developmentally controlled, the membrane form being specifically detected in actively growing fruits, depending on the phosphorylation of SUS proteins (Anguenot et al, 2006). It will thus be interesting to determine whether the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of OsSUS5 and OsSUS7 alters their subcellular localization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in these correlation analyses, one cannot rule out that posttranslational modifications or proteinprotein interactions modulate V max while the enzyme content remains constant. For instance, a Susy isoform has been shown to be phosphorylated and subsequently translocated to the plasma membrane in developing tomato fruit (Anguenot et al, 2006), raising the possibility that UDP-glucose could somehow be channeled into cell wall constituents (Winter and Huber, 2000). Moreover, acid invertases can be inhibited by proteinaceous inhibitors in tomato fruit (Tauzin et al, 2014), thus interfering in vivo with its development and hexose content (Jin et al, 2009).…”
Section: Inherent (Enzyme-based) Versus Hierarchical (Network-based) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soluble Sus has been described extensively in different plants (Winter and Huber, 2000) and may be involved in metabolic activities related to glycolysis and energy production. Soluble Sus exists in equilibrium with the membraneassociated form, as in tobacco (Matic et al, 2004), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum; Amor et al, 1995), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruits (Anguenot et al, 2006), and maize (Carlson and Chourey, 1996). Plasma membrane-associated Sus probably provides metabolites for both callose synthase and cellulose synthase.…”
Section: Pollen Tubes Contain a Protein Biochemically And Immunologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second form of Sus is associated with plasma membranes or cell walls and is generally involved in the synthesis of cell wall components, providing metabolites (usually UDP-Glc) for callose synthase and cellulose synthase (Amor et al, 1995). The association of Sus with cell membranes may be regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation processes (Anguenot et al, 2006). This model is supported by evidence obtained with cotton fibers (Ruan et al, 1997), in which mutants deficient in fiber synthesis showed altered levels of Sus and suppression of its gene activity inhibited fiber growth (Ruan et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%