2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein network analysis — A new approach for quantifying wheat dough microstructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher protein area (indicating a low aperture area) and protein junction (related to the junction density and branching rate) values indicate that the gluten network has greater connectivity [37]. The lacunarity represents the amount of gaps and irregularities in a protein network and it is positively correlated with dough development time and dough stability time, whereas the protein endpoints and endpoint rate are negatively correlated with those properties [25].…”
Section: Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher protein area (indicating a low aperture area) and protein junction (related to the junction density and branching rate) values indicate that the gluten network has greater connectivity [37]. The lacunarity represents the amount of gaps and irregularities in a protein network and it is positively correlated with dough development time and dough stability time, whereas the protein endpoints and endpoint rate are negatively correlated with those properties [25].…”
Section: Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of biscuit is closely related to properties of gluten proteins (gliadin and glutenin) owing to its unique viscoelasticity (Delcour et al., 2012). The gluten can form a continuous network in the dough when flour is mixed with water (Leon et al., 2010), which confers to water absorption capacity and gas retention of wheat dough (Bernklau, Lucas, Jekle, & Becker, 2016). Numerous studies have reported that higher protein levels in wheat flour induced more gluten network formation, which led to a smaller diameter and firmer textured biscuit (Pareyt, Wilderjans, Goesaert, Brijs, & Delcour, 2008; Pauly, Pareyt, Lambrecht, Fierens, & Delcour, 2013; Zhou et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of gluten are determined by its microstructure and composition (Bernklau et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2014). The secondary structures of gluten were divided into intermolecular β‐sheets, antiparallel β‐sheets, α‐helices, β‐turns, and β‐sheets (Wang et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the gluten microstructure are detectable at macroscopic scale as alterations in dough rheology (Jekle and Becker, 2013;Lee et al, 2001;Peighambardoust et al, 2006). The impact of water (Bernklau et al, 2016;Létang et al, 1999) and redox agents (Bernklau et al, 2017;Lucas et al, 2018a) on gluten microstructure in wheat dough has been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is thus well known how gluten during heating changes on molecular scale, the impact of these changes on its microstructure remains unknown. We here used CLSM and protein network analysis (PNA) (Bernklau et al, 2016) to study heat induced changes in gluten in non-fermented dough on microscale and related the outcome of literature data on the corresponding molecular scale changes. The main originality of the study resides in the use of Aq1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%