2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-228012/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Model Accuracy Estimation Empowered by Deep Learning and Inter-residue Distance Prediction in CASP14

Abstract: The inter-residue contact prediction and deep learning showed the promise to improve the estimation of protein model accuracy (CASP13) in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13). During the 2020 CASP14 experiment, we developed and tested several EMA predictors that used deep learning with the new features based on inter-residue distance/contact predictions as well as the existing model quality features. The average global distance test (GDT-TS) score loss of ranking CASP14 structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CASP assessors provided access to full label information before it was publicly available (i.e., prior to PDB release) for many of the targets which enabled us to analyze our predictions across 61 protein targets. We evaluated these targets based on residue-residue contacts, which are defined by CASP as having a Cβ (or Cα for glycine) distance less than 8 Å [ 18 ]. Predicted contact probabilities were straightforward to derive from our binned distance predictions; we summed the probabilities of the first three bins since their distances correspond to those less than 8 Å.…”
Section: Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CASP assessors provided access to full label information before it was publicly available (i.e., prior to PDB release) for many of the targets which enabled us to analyze our predictions across 61 protein targets. We evaluated these targets based on residue-residue contacts, which are defined by CASP as having a Cβ (or Cα for glycine) distance less than 8 Å [ 18 ]. Predicted contact probabilities were straightforward to derive from our binned distance predictions; we summed the probabilities of the first three bins since their distances correspond to those less than 8 Å.…”
Section: Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated these targets based on residue-residue contacts, which are defined by CASP as having a Cβ (or Cα for glycine) distance less than 8 Å. [13] Predicted contact probabilities were straightforward to derive from our binned distance predictions: we summed the probabilities of the first three bins since their distances correspond to those less than 8 Å.…”
Section: Evaluation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Sixths lowest average LOSS (Table 3 [58][59][60][61][62][63] by three measures: MCC(50) (Table 1), RMSE (Table 2), and LOSS (Table 3). Results are reproduced from the CASP website at (https://predictioncenter.org/casp14).…”
Section: Casp14: Meshi_consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%