1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(96)01475-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein-loaded poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles for oral administration: formulation, structural and release characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Encapsulation efficiency increases with increasing polymer concentration (Mehta et al, 1996;Rafati et al, 1997;Li et al, 1999). For example, the encapsulation efficiency increased from 53.1 to 70.9% when concentration of the polymer increased from 20.0 to 32.5% (Mehta et al, 1996).…”
Section: Polymer Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Encapsulation efficiency increases with increasing polymer concentration (Mehta et al, 1996;Rafati et al, 1997;Li et al, 1999). For example, the encapsulation efficiency increased from 53.1 to 70.9% when concentration of the polymer increased from 20.0 to 32.5% (Mehta et al, 1996).…”
Section: Polymer Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…First, when highly concentrated, the polymer precipitates faster on the surface of the dispersed phase and prevents drug diffusion across the phase boundary (Rafati et al, 1997). Second, the high concentration increases viscosity of the solution and delays the drug diffusion within the polymer droplets (Bodmeier and McGinity, 1988).…”
Section: Polymer Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patterns of enhanced entrapment efficiency are attributed to the higher viscosity of the DCM phase as more polymer amount is present and the ensuing larger size of the primary emulsion droplets. Furthermore, higher polymer concentrations give rise to more rapid polymer deposition as the DCM is removed from the system, which is expected to retard any unwanted insulin dissolution into the continuous phase of the secondary emulsion (Rafati et al, 1997).…”
Section: Effect Of Polymer Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, RG 503H has a higher inherent viscosity than RG 502H (0.38 vs 0.19 dl/g). Consequently, the increase in the polymer solution viscosity led to a higher entrapment of the protein because it limits the migration of the protein from the inner phase towards the outer one [34].…”
Section: Gdnf Encapsulation Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%