2000
DOI: 10.3989/gya.2000.v51.i1-2.406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein-lipid interactions at interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Foam becomes less stable when both polar lipids and proteins are around the interface at the same time. The viscoelasticity arising from intermolecular interaction between proteins was reduced by lipid molecules and the mobility of the lipid is compromised by the protein (Sarker and Wilde 1999; Fillery‐Travis and others 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foam becomes less stable when both polar lipids and proteins are around the interface at the same time. The viscoelasticity arising from intermolecular interaction between proteins was reduced by lipid molecules and the mobility of the lipid is compromised by the protein (Sarker and Wilde 1999; Fillery‐Travis and others 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary lipid oxidation products can bind to proteins in two main ways by either binding to an active site or cavity or at less well defined hydrophobic patches at positions close to the surface of the protein (Fillery-Travis, Mills, & Wilde, 2000). Aldehydes as a product of metal catalysed lipid oxidation cause, protein-lipid aggregation via crosslink bonds (Gardner, 1979).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial and final protein fractions of the foam and dispersions are listed in Table 2. The PCF rise for the later samples may be due to reduction in oil drops in the dispersion which had reduced foam stability by countering stabilizers at the bubble surfaces [12]. Earlier studies of foam concentration of soluble proteins, at about 10 9 higher concentration than examined here, found PCF values in the range 1.5-2.5 [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%