2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein kinase C–dependent and independent signaling pathways regulate synaptic GluR1 and GluR4 AMPAR subunits during in vitro classical conditioning

Abstract: Protein kinase C (PKC) signal transduction pathways have been implicated in mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and learning, however, the roles of the different PKC family isoforms remain to be clarified. Previous studies showed that NMDAR-mediated trafficking of GluR4-containing AMPARs supports conditioning and that the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) have a central role in the synaptic delivery of GluR4 subunits. Here, an in vitro model of classical conditioning was used to assess the role of PKC is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(87 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MPR has been previously implicated in GluA4 trafficking (Boehm et al, 2006) and incorporates the established interaction sites for the protein 4.1N (Coleman et al, 2003), PKCγ (Correia et al, 2003), α-actinin-1 and IQGAP1 (Nuriya et al, 2005). The MPR sequence has been reported to promote GluA4 surface expression (Carvalho et al, 1999;Coleman et al, 2003;Gomes et al, 2007;Zheng and Keifer, 2008;2014) as well as phosphorylation by PKCγ at Ser862 (Gomes et al, 2007). However, using a RKR/SSS mutant to selectively knock out 4.1N and PKCg interactions, we found that these proteins alone are not sufficient for PKA-dependent synaptic delivery of GluA4 at immature CA3-CA1 synapses.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanism Underlying Pka-driven Synaptic Insertionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The MPR has been previously implicated in GluA4 trafficking (Boehm et al, 2006) and incorporates the established interaction sites for the protein 4.1N (Coleman et al, 2003), PKCγ (Correia et al, 2003), α-actinin-1 and IQGAP1 (Nuriya et al, 2005). The MPR sequence has been reported to promote GluA4 surface expression (Carvalho et al, 1999;Coleman et al, 2003;Gomes et al, 2007;Zheng and Keifer, 2008;2014) as well as phosphorylation by PKCγ at Ser862 (Gomes et al, 2007). However, using a RKR/SSS mutant to selectively knock out 4.1N and PKCg interactions, we found that these proteins alone are not sufficient for PKA-dependent synaptic delivery of GluA4 at immature CA3-CA1 synapses.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanism Underlying Pka-driven Synaptic Insertionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A recent study using PKA-selective small interference RNA confirms that PKA activity in the spinal cord is essential for the development of morphine-induced hypersensitivity (Tumati et al, 2011). GluA4 can also be phosphorylated at Ser842 by PKC-g (Gomes et al, 2007;Zheng and Keifer, 2008). Deletion of the gene encoding PKC-g abolishes opioid-induced hypersensitivity (Célérier et al, 2004), whereas repeated administration of m-opioid agonists increases PKC-g activity (Chakrabarti et al, 2005;Narita et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These data indicate that oligomeric A␤ treatment interferes with the expression of BDNF during in vitro conditioning. (24,25), we showed that PKA, CaMKII and CaMKIV, CREB, ERK, and the isoform of PKC were activated during conditioning. To determine whether any of these signaling pathways are affected by oligomeric A␤ treatment during conditioning, Western blot analysis was performed.…”
Section: Conditioning Is Inhibited By Oligomeric But Not Fibrillar A␤-mentioning
confidence: 97%