2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein identification by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry using retention time prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome these drawbacks, we have compared the possible combinations obtained by software analysis with the sequences of the main rapeseed proteins (cruciferin and napin) (Schwenke, 1994). The purpose of that investigation was to keep only the peptides which can be encountered in rapeseed proteins (Palmblad et al, 2004). As a result, the list was reduced to only two possible sequences for the peptide with a MM of 343.4 g/ mol: VLI or LVI, which correspond to only one combination.…”
Section: Description Of the Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these drawbacks, we have compared the possible combinations obtained by software analysis with the sequences of the main rapeseed proteins (cruciferin and napin) (Schwenke, 1994). The purpose of that investigation was to keep only the peptides which can be encountered in rapeseed proteins (Palmblad et al, 2004). As a result, the list was reduced to only two possible sequences for the peptide with a MM of 343.4 g/ mol: VLI or LVI, which correspond to only one combination.…”
Section: Description Of the Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medium was experimentally derived to elicit the best growth parameters for vegetative Y. pestis cells and was previously shown to permit full-scale growth under all the conditions used here (22). Therefore, BCS medium ensures that differences in protein expression are not due to growth arrest, and the growth parameters of temperature and calcium used here have previously been employed to study changes in gene (52) and protein (54,74) expression. Taken together, the observed changes in protein expression detected in this study reflect adaptations to growth conditions rather than changes due to a cessation of growth.…”
Section: Differential Protein Expression Following Change From 26°cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the genomic, and thus, the proteomic, complexity of an organism increases, the ability to identify proteins (or peptides) on the basis of mass measurements alone decreases. Additional information such as isoelectric point, LC elution time or, most commonly, the analysis of peptide fragment ions must be used to distinguish peptides that have identical or very similar masses [11][12][13][14]. Experimental approaches to address this complexity include more extensive protein or peptide separations, or focusing on only those peptides with a specific physical characteristic (e.g., isolation of cysteinyl peptides by chemical labeling or solid phase extraction techniques [15][16][17], and fractionation techniques to add a second separation dimension, e.g., MudPIT [2, 18 -23], in addition to the use of peptide ion fragmentation patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%