2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2012.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein function prediction using neighbor relativity in protein–protein interaction network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As technologies in the experiments progress, the network-based methods can be improved and widely extended. For instance, even though the neighborhood counting method [1] in protein function prediction only considers the count of annotated functions in the neighborhood from a PPI network, the recently developed methods [72, 83] can contain not only neighborhood information but also functional similarities from multiple networks. In addition, module-assisted methods that focus on identifying a functional group of proteins are also available and well summarized in [122].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As technologies in the experiments progress, the network-based methods can be improved and widely extended. For instance, even though the neighborhood counting method [1] in protein function prediction only considers the count of annotated functions in the neighborhood from a PPI network, the recently developed methods [72, 83] can contain not only neighborhood information but also functional similarities from multiple networks. In addition, module-assisted methods that focus on identifying a functional group of proteins are also available and well summarized in [122].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the sequential linear neighborhood propagation method [71] sequentially updates unlabeled proteins according to their shortest path distance to the set of labeled proteins. Finally, the neighbor relativity coefficient (NRC) method [72] derives the NRC score by integrating various graph topological properties, such as the shortest path distance, path connectivity, and common neighbors.…”
Section: Network-based Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified four state-of-the-art neighborhood analysis methods and compared their performances for our Saccharomyces cerevisiae dataset with each other and with our methods. We chose the neighborhood counting method of Schwikowski et al [1], the chi-square method of Hishigaki et al [2], a recent version of the neighbor relativity coefficient (NRC) of Moosavi et al [21] and the FS-weight based method of Chua et al [23]. The work of Moosavi et al [21], clearly the strongest of the four methods, focuses on the prediction of three functional groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein path connectivity score Protein path connectivity score [21] is defined as a measure for network connectivity. It is based on paths between two proteins in an interaction network and is calculated as:…”
Section: Relative Functional Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some others design probabilistic approaches such as Markov random field (Kui et al, 2002;Letovsky and Kasif, 2003). A more complicated method is to use multiple networks (Deng et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2006) or multiple other data sources, such as genetic interactions and coexpression interactions (Joshi et al, 2004) and sematic similarity between function classes (Moosavi et al, 2013;Jiang and McQuay, 2012), to enrich the information of PPI networks for neighbour-based functional prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%