2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein extraction from activated sludge: An analytical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the amount of proteins and humic-like substances cannot be taken into account for the EDTA extractions. Ras et al (2008) also have demonstrated that the colorimetric method used to determine the protein content can either overestimate or underestimate the protein concentrations in EPS samples. Thus, three assumptions may be hypothesized: (a) the measured protein content is the real one and differences between the samples really exist, (b) the chemicals used interfere with the protein determination and do not allow to know the real protein content, and (c) the colorimetric method badly estimates the protein content and the protein contents can be determined only by protocols that add no chemicals during the extraction.…”
Section: Organic Composition Of Eps Extracts Of Anaerobic Granular Slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the amount of proteins and humic-like substances cannot be taken into account for the EDTA extractions. Ras et al (2008) also have demonstrated that the colorimetric method used to determine the protein content can either overestimate or underestimate the protein concentrations in EPS samples. Thus, three assumptions may be hypothesized: (a) the measured protein content is the real one and differences between the samples really exist, (b) the chemicals used interfere with the protein determination and do not allow to know the real protein content, and (c) the colorimetric method badly estimates the protein content and the protein contents can be determined only by protocols that add no chemicals during the extraction.…”
Section: Organic Composition Of Eps Extracts Of Anaerobic Granular Slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main SMP components measured in this experiment were protein, polysaccharide, DNA, and humic acid. Protein and humic acid were measured with a modified Lowry method (Ras et al 2008), polysaccharide was measured with an anthrone colorimetric assay (Gaudy 1962), and DNA with a diphenylamine method (Brown and Lester 1980). Table 1 shows the water quality of the SBR effluents and the SMP organic composition.…”
Section: Smp In the Effluent Of Sbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers used the DNA content in extracted EPS to evaluate the damage to nuclei whereby high DNA content indicated contamination with nucleic materials Liu and Fang, 2002;Sheng et al, 2010). Some used the activity of the intracellular enzyme-glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) to evaluate the lysis of cell membranes (Wingender et al, 2001;Ras et al, 2008) while others used 2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate (KDO), a characteristic component of lipopolysaccharides in the cell wall of Gram-negative (G − ) bacteria, to evaluate the damage to cell walls (Kumada et al, 1993;Yu et al, 2011;Adav and Lee, 2008). However, the abovementioned tests for cellular materials have their limits: the content of DNA in EPS is uncertain and so the level of DNA contamination resulting from cellular damage is also uncertain; environmental conditions, such as high temperatures and acidic or alkaline pH, can deactivate G6PD (Wang et al, 2002), and only Gram-negative (G − ) bacteria contain KDO (Kumada et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%