2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Evolution by Molecular Tinkering: Diversification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily from a Ligand-Dependent Ancestor

Abstract: Phylogenetic reconstruction of the structure and function of the ancestor of the nuclear receptor protein family reveals how functional diversity evolves by subtle tinkering with an ancestral template.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
245
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
245
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Nuclear receptor signalling [83,84]; thus, the expansive diversity in this group of proteins may have evolved with the independent origins of numerous diverse ligand binding capabilities [85]. Unlike the other cell signalling mechanisms discussed here, NRs act as both the receptor and the effector molecule, providing the most direct link between the extracellular signal and the transcriptional response.…”
Section: (B) Canonical Wnt Signallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(c) Nuclear receptor signalling [83,84]; thus, the expansive diversity in this group of proteins may have evolved with the independent origins of numerous diverse ligand binding capabilities [85]. Unlike the other cell signalling mechanisms discussed here, NRs act as both the receptor and the effector molecule, providing the most direct link between the extracellular signal and the transcriptional response.…”
Section: (B) Canonical Wnt Signallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker [88] also described an oestrogen-related receptor (family NR3) from T. adhaerens but indicated that it contained a hormone binding pocket that was too small to accommodate a hormone, suggesting it may not function the way NR3 family receptors do in bilaterians. Among sponges, two NRs have been identified from Amphimedon queenslandica, Suberites domuncula and Oscarella carmela-one, NR2, appears to be an orthologue of HNF4 and is found only in A. queenslandica and O. carmela; the second, apparently sponge-specific, is found in A. queenslandica, S. domuncula and O. carmela [85,91]. Three NR orthologues have been identified from ctenophores (two from M. leidyi and one from P. bachei), all of which appear to be orthologues of the NR2 family but none of which has a canonical DNA binding domain.…”
Section: (B) Canonical Wnt Signallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it was not an easy task, as the MR was the last cloned receptor from the adrenal and sex steroid receptor family, which also includes the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) (Evans 1988, Markov et al 2009. The MR and other steroid receptors belong to the nuclear receptor family, a diverse group of transcription factors that arose in multicellular animals, which have key roles in the physiology of humans and other vertebrates (Markov et al 2009, Bridgham et al 2010, Huang et al 2010, Baker et al 2013. A 3-ketosteroid receptor (SR) ancestor of the MR, GR, PR and AR first 234:1 appears in amphioxus, a close ancestor of vertebrates , Paris et al 2008, Markov et al 2009, Katsu et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only a small number of ASR studies have included in vivo evaluation of inferred ancestral proteins and these have related to functionality rather than fitness (e.g. transcriptional response to different ligands [Bridgham et al 2006[Bridgham et al , 2009[Bridgham et al , 2010Eick et al 2012), ability to rescue different phenotypes (Finnigan et al 2012), ability to confer resistance to b-lactams (Risso et al 2013)]. In this study, we utilise our previously reconstructed ancestral LeuB enzymes to investigate the organismal fitness conferred by these inferred ancestral enzymes in relation to their favourable biochemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%