2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Engineering by Combined Computational and In Vitro Evolution Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we engineered four N-TIMP2 mutants with single-digit picomolar K i values for binding to MMP-14, improving affinity toward this target by nearly 900-fold and improving binding specificity relative to other MMP family members by 100 -16,000-fold. These impressive results demonstrate the enormous potential of the combined computational/directed evolution methodology for protein engineering (39). In this study, we used computational methods to reduce the library size to ϳ10 8 of the most promising N-TIMP2 variants, a number that is tractable by the YSD technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we engineered four N-TIMP2 mutants with single-digit picomolar K i values for binding to MMP-14, improving affinity toward this target by nearly 900-fold and improving binding specificity relative to other MMP family members by 100 -16,000-fold. These impressive results demonstrate the enormous potential of the combined computational/directed evolution methodology for protein engineering (39). In this study, we used computational methods to reduce the library size to ϳ10 8 of the most promising N-TIMP2 variants, a number that is tractable by the YSD technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best variant identified showed 900-fold improvement in MMP-14 affinity with an inhibitory constant of 0.9 pM, greatly enhanced selectivity, and improvements in binding to MMP-14 on the cell surface and inhibition of breast cancer cell invasion [Arkadash et al 2017]. The encouraging results from these studies point to the utility of integrating structural and computational insights with directed evolution approaches [Rosenfeld et al 2016], and we anticipate that this could be a general path forward for developing TIMP-based drugs selectively targeting the different MMPs most strongly implicated as therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Keeping in mind the MMP-independent activities of the natural TIMPs [Chirco et al 2006; Stetler-Stevenson 2008; Brew and Nagase 2010], an additional important aspect of developing TIMP-based drugs will be to better define the TIMP epitopes responsible for some of these activities, and to remove unwanted off-target activities through protein engineering.…”
Section: Developing Mmp Inhibitors For Therapeutic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein engineering methods include (i) random mutagenesis, (ii) rational design, and (iii) semirational design (2,8,(18)(19)(20). It was previously shown that these approaches can be applied separately or in combination to tailor enzymes to enhance their stability in organic solvents (1,9,12,18,21,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein engineering by rational design requires structural information, and the precise regions for mutagenesis are identified usually by computational tools or prior knowledge (17,(22)(23)(24). One recently developed concept for enzyme stabilization in organic solvents is the modification of residues buried in tunnels within the protein structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%