1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.1997.0165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Content of Single Kernels of Wheat by Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
93
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
93
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of applications have been reported using SKNIR in wheat and maize for quality and fungal infection [4][5][6][7][8]14,21,22,25 , as well as for protein 4,26 and hardness 4,17 in wheat. In barley, there have been a number of recent reports on SK measurements for grain hardness 2,13,[15][16][17]19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of applications have been reported using SKNIR in wheat and maize for quality and fungal infection [4][5][6][7][8]14,21,22,25 , as well as for protein 4,26 and hardness 4,17 in wheat. In barley, there have been a number of recent reports on SK measurements for grain hardness 2,13,[15][16][17]19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Furthermore, higher wavelengths sometimes involved in this measurement mode may not produce linear responses between spectra and compound concentrations in single-kernel analysis. 4 Some research has reported NIRS calibrations for predicting the major attributes of single soybeans. The first NIRS study analyzing single soybeans determined moisture by transmittance (standard error of prediction (SEP) = 0.65− 0.69%).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard analytical approaches used in analysis of reflectance data include (see [9] for review): discriminant analysis [10,11,26], principal component analysis [3,21,[26][27][28], multi-regression approaches, like partial least square (PLS) [12,29,30], use of spectral band ratios (indices) [3,[31][32][33], decision trees [34], artificial neural networks [17,28,34], and support vector machines [8,35]. One common denominator in all of these analytical approaches is that they do not incorporate-or take advantage of -the spatial information available in a HI data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%