2018
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein binding of rifampicin is not saturated when using high-dose rifampicin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of plasma protein binding for safranal varied from 87 to 92% in the experimental concentration range of 5–20 μM (Figure ). Plasma protein binding of rifampicin as standard is found to be 91%, which matches with the reported results (82–92%). , Plasma protein binding can be classified as very high protein binding (>98%), high protein binding (85–98%), and medium-to-low protein binding (<85%) . Therefore, results indicate that plasma protein binding is high and concentration-independent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The extent of plasma protein binding for safranal varied from 87 to 92% in the experimental concentration range of 5–20 μM (Figure ). Plasma protein binding of rifampicin as standard is found to be 91%, which matches with the reported results (82–92%). , Plasma protein binding can be classified as very high protein binding (>98%), high protein binding (85–98%), and medium-to-low protein binding (<85%) . Therefore, results indicate that plasma protein binding is high and concentration-independent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Of note, large interindividual variability in AUC 0-24 h and C max was observed, with exposures between groups overlapping considerably (table 3 and supplementary figure E2). Protein-unbound rifampicin exposure, or free fraction, was comparable to other (lower) doses of rifampicin [14]. For rifampicin pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters of other study drugs, see supplementary figure E3 and supplementary table E1, respectively.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This dogma could be questioned in meningitis patients where protein levels in CSF can be substantially increased [ 4 ]. In plasma, rifampicin is around 80% protein-bound [ 37 , 38 ]. Albumin accounts for 30%–40% of the binding in serum, which leaves a possible important role for γ-globulin binding proteins [ 37 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total rifampicin concentrations were measured and modeled while only unbound concentrations are generally considered to exhibit pharmacological effects. However, it has recently been shown that the free fraction remains constant over a wide range of rifampicin concentrations [ 38 ], mitigating the risk of bias when evaluating total concentrations as done here. The exposure-safety analysis performed is rather simplistic, evaluating all type of adverse events jointly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%