2020
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2020.1821657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein amino-termini and how to identify them

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques mostly rely on the bottom-up proteomics, in which a site-specific externally added protease digests proteomes to generate peptides before chromatographic separation and tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis, in contrast to the top-down proteomics approach, which directly analyzes intact proteins with all retained modifications by MS (Aebersold and Mann, 2016). Various proteomics technologies for Nand C-terminal analysis have been recently comprehensively described (reviewed in Tanco et al, 2015;Demir et al, 2018;Kaleja et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Perrar et al, 2019;Bogaert and Gevaert, 2020;Kaushal and Lee, 2021;Mintoo et al, 2021). Due to some technical difficulties (e.g., poor ionization efficiencies of protein C-termini, low yielding carboxyl group labeling strategies), C-terminomics technologies are, however, less successfully implemented and widely used, in comparison to the N-terminomics methods, which in recent years have become an indispensable tool in positional proteomics (Eckhard et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methods For Characterization Of Mitochondrial Protein N-term...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These techniques mostly rely on the bottom-up proteomics, in which a site-specific externally added protease digests proteomes to generate peptides before chromatographic separation and tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis, in contrast to the top-down proteomics approach, which directly analyzes intact proteins with all retained modifications by MS (Aebersold and Mann, 2016). Various proteomics technologies for Nand C-terminal analysis have been recently comprehensively described (reviewed in Tanco et al, 2015;Demir et al, 2018;Kaleja et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Perrar et al, 2019;Bogaert and Gevaert, 2020;Kaushal and Lee, 2021;Mintoo et al, 2021). Due to some technical difficulties (e.g., poor ionization efficiencies of protein C-termini, low yielding carboxyl group labeling strategies), C-terminomics technologies are, however, less successfully implemented and widely used, in comparison to the N-terminomics methods, which in recent years have become an indispensable tool in positional proteomics (Eckhard et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methods For Characterization Of Mitochondrial Protein N-term...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive selection strategy relies on a direct enrichment of N-terminal peptides from the peptide mixture [e.g., the Subtiligase and Chemical Enrichment of Protease Substrates (CHOPS) methods]. In the negative selection methods, the N-terminal peptides are enriched indirectly by the removal of undesired (internal, C-terminal) peptides (e.g., COFRADIC, ChaFRADIC, and TAILS methods) (Bogaert and Gevaert, 2020).…”
Section: Methods For Characterization Of Mitochondrial Protein N-term...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations