2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01681-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein adsorption properties of OEG monolayers and dense PNIPAM brushes probed by neutron reflectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For measurements in water the sample was placed in a stainless steel cell filled with MilliQ water and mounted on top of the sample stage. Here For PNIPAM-B-0.2-240 at 15 C we assumed a four-layer model, referring to earlier results by Brouette et al 35 We justify this by the comparable brush samples. In contrast to the above mentioned three-layer model an additional brush layer towards the D 2 O layer with a higher solvent content is added.…”
Section: Ellipsometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For measurements in water the sample was placed in a stainless steel cell filled with MilliQ water and mounted on top of the sample stage. Here For PNIPAM-B-0.2-240 at 15 C we assumed a four-layer model, referring to earlier results by Brouette et al 35 We justify this by the comparable brush samples. In contrast to the above mentioned three-layer model an additional brush layer towards the D 2 O layer with a higher solvent content is added.…”
Section: Ellipsometrymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For PNIPAM-B-0.2-240 at 15 °C, we assumed a four-layer model, referring to earlier results obtained by Brouette et al We justify this by the comparable brush samples. In contrast to the above-mentioned three-layer model, an additional brush layer toward the D 2 O layer with a higher solvent content is added.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of dry PNIPAM, , is sometimes arbitrarily taken equal to 0.95 g/cm 3 by certain authors [106], but the actual density can be measured by U-tube oscillation [107] or by X-ray reflectometry [108]. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can also be used, in some cases, to determine the graft density, as reported by Mizutani et al [109].…”
Section: Characterization Of Brushesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In thicker brushes, the changing signal of the top layer would be overlapped by the less-changing signal of the underlying bulk layer. 15 Moreover, brush parameters like the grafting density are easily adjustable in the preparation of ultrathin brushes, which in the future might be favorable for tuning the proteinadsorbing properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%