2022
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protectivity of COVID-19 Vaccines and Its Relationship with Humoral Immune Response and Vaccination Strategy: A One-Year Cohort Study

Abstract: This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine schemes, homologous versus heterologous vaccine strategies, and vaccine-induced anti-S-RBD-IgG antibody response in preventing COVID-19 among 942 healthcare workers 1 year after vaccination with the inactivated and/or mRNA vaccines. All participants received the first two primary doses of vaccines, 13.6% of them lacked dose 3, 50.5% dose 4, and 90.3% dose 5. Antibody levels increased with the increase in number of vaccine doses an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These specific immune alterations might involve the Tregs expression or the emergence of exhausted T cells. Multiple doses of mRNA vaccines are recommended for high-risk groups ( 28 , 29 ). However, considering the potential for immune tolerance and exhaustion in cellular immunity after repeated mRNA vaccine administration (especially five or more doses), there might be an alternative strategy for SARS-CoV-2 immunization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These specific immune alterations might involve the Tregs expression or the emergence of exhausted T cells. Multiple doses of mRNA vaccines are recommended for high-risk groups ( 28 , 29 ). However, considering the potential for immune tolerance and exhaustion in cellular immunity after repeated mRNA vaccine administration (especially five or more doses), there might be an alternative strategy for SARS-CoV-2 immunization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%