2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective prototype-Beta and Delta-Omicron chimeric RBD-dimer vaccines against SARS-CoV-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential limitations of our study might be the combined evaluation of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients as well as the sampling day after last immunization. However, our findings on salivary immunity support the idea of an adapted vaccine or alternative delivery strategy such as mucosal vaccine administration as a booster for optimal protection against SARS-CoV-2 ( 3 , 8 ).…”
Section: Lettersupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Potential limitations of our study might be the combined evaluation of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients as well as the sampling day after last immunization. However, our findings on salivary immunity support the idea of an adapted vaccine or alternative delivery strategy such as mucosal vaccine administration as a booster for optimal protection against SARS-CoV-2 ( 3 , 8 ).…”
Section: Lettersupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the development of updated vaccines as boosters is needed for better protection against immune escape of current subvariants (especially BA.4 and BA.5) and possible future epidemic subvariants. 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more than 4 mice in each group are sufficient to meet the requirement of statistical power. To reduce the error and improve the reliability of the results, we generally used 6-10 mice per group following the previous studies 38 , 39 , 40 and the suggestions of in vivo experiments. 41 6-10 mice per group had sufficient statistical power for making a valid test according to the sample size calculation described by Charan and Kantharia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%