2020
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective Microglial Subset in Development, Aging, and Disease: Lessons From Transcriptomic Studies

Abstract: Microglial heterogeneity has been the topic of much discussion in the scientific community. Elucidation of their plasticity and adaptability to disease states triggered early efforts to characterize microglial subsets. Over time, their phenotypes, and later on their homeostatic signature, were revealed, through the use of increasingly advanced transcriptomic techniques. Recently, an increasing number of these "microglial signatures" have been reported in various homeostatic and disease contexts. Remarkably, ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population of microglial cells is heterogeneous and shows phenotypic and functional diversity (Silvin and Ginhoux, 2018). A CD11c + microglial subset is involved in myelinogenesis (Wlodarczyk et al, 2017), and several lines of evidence support specific functions and protective effects of CD11c + microglia (Benmamar-Badel et al, 2020). In our study both microglia and infiltrating CD11c + cells expressed genes involved in functions related to glial development and differentiation, whereas neuronal function was represented in microglia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The population of microglial cells is heterogeneous and shows phenotypic and functional diversity (Silvin and Ginhoux, 2018). A CD11c + microglial subset is involved in myelinogenesis (Wlodarczyk et al, 2017), and several lines of evidence support specific functions and protective effects of CD11c + microglia (Benmamar-Badel et al, 2020). In our study both microglia and infiltrating CD11c + cells expressed genes involved in functions related to glial development and differentiation, whereas neuronal function was represented in microglia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In some cases, the quantitative differentiation of markers is advised. For example, in the adult brain, subtle differences in CD45 protein amount can be detected between microglia expressing CD11b + /CD45 low and macrophages expressing CD11b + /CD45 high (Ford et al, 1995 ; Zhang et al, 2002 ; Grabert et al, 2016 ), although caution must be taken because CD45 expression increases in microglia upon inflammation and with aging (Roesch et al, 2018 ; Haage et al, 2019 ; Benmamar-Badel et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: How To Discriminate Innate From Infiltrated Macrophagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the binding is barely detectable in the brain. Iba1 (or AIF1) and GFAP are markers of brain microglial cells and astrocytes, respectively [ 45 , 46 ]. Their presence in the lung and skin is due to secretion of Iba1/AIF1 by inflammatory macrophages [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%