Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum: Shared decision‐making or still subjective?

Abstract

Aim:The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. Method: Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed.Results: Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases.Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). Conclusion:The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.

Oncologic Outcomes for Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis

“…Our study also observed a signi cant reduction in need for intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions for robotic patients when compared to laparoscopic patients. This result is consistent with the existing literature (23) and is of particular importance considering the negative impact of blood transfusions on colorectal cancer recurrence and mortality (24). It has been postulated that perioperative transfusions in cancer patients weaken the immune system permitting reduced cancer control.…”

What affects the selection of diverting ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study

“…Due to surgeon factor would affect surgical process [ 12 ], the same experienced surgical team at our center performed all procedures in order to eliminate bias caused by different experience. All surgeons have the same level of experiece.…”

The role of dietary prehabilitation on anastomotic healing

“…Perhaps the most mitigating evidence against surgical technique as a cause of anastomotic leaks relates to the observation that even in high volume centers, when performed by expert high volume surgeons, leaks still occur, although at low rates [4]. The fact that use of the protective stoma continues to be advocated in selected cases also supports the notion that some leaks simply cannot be prevented [5,6 ▪ ]. Modifiable and actionable aspects among ‘patient-related factors’ include weight loss, smoking cessation, limiting blood loss and the application of enhanced recovery programs (ERPs).…”