2017
DOI: 10.1177/2158244017706711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective Factors in Families: Themes From a Socioecological Study of Australian Defence Force Families Experiencing Parental Deployment

Abstract: Family 1He (Sam, 3 years) didn't understand the difference between deployment and going to work, which created huge meltdowns when Caleb was home after deployment and then said he was going to "work." Family 2You are not really in or out after they die. I find it hard to connect with other defence families at Army unit days. Family 3He was also really upset by some of the parenting decisions I had made in his absence. It was hard having those very honest conversations where he was saying he thought those decis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deployed parents reported feeling like they were not really able to coparent while away even if they maintained communication with their family. Reconciling different needs with regard to the timing and purpose of communication proved challenging for many military families as they coparented long-distance (Rogers-Baber, 2017). Parents also revealed the complexity of communication, including the crucial role of home front parents in facilitating or limiting the deployed parents’ access to their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deployed parents reported feeling like they were not really able to coparent while away even if they maintained communication with their family. Reconciling different needs with regard to the timing and purpose of communication proved challenging for many military families as they coparented long-distance (Rogers-Baber, 2017). Parents also revealed the complexity of communication, including the crucial role of home front parents in facilitating or limiting the deployed parents’ access to their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, parents may put in place family routines (Fiese, 2006) that can be maintained regardless of the service member’s status in the deployment cycle. Rituals that reinforce family cohesiveness and flexibility, and the enduring importance of an absent parent, can strengthen a young child’s sense of security and safety even when a parent is deployed (Acker, Nicholson, & DeVoe, 2019; Rogers-Baber, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a lack of awareness of services, some supports provided by the ADF act as a protective factor for families 26 . These can include gatherings, such as Unit family days, pastoral and social work support, funded communication with the member whilst deployed, subsidised housing and a few children's resources, mainly for 8‐ to 12‐year‐olds 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research about military families with young children is limited across the globe, but particularly so outside the US (which has a strong military culture), and even more so within Australia. There is an urgent need for research into the unique issues experienced by ADF families (Rogers-Baber, 2017;McFarlane, 2009;Siebler, 2009). There is also 'a distinct lack of Australian data about the impact of deployment on families', as found by Baber (2016, p. 142).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%