Protective Factors for LGBTI+ Youth Wellbeing: A Scoping Review Underpinned by Recognition Theory

Abstract

Considerable research has been undertaken regarding the mental health inequalities experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI+) youth as a consequence of societal and individual prejudice, stigma and discrimination. Far less research has focussed on protective factors that promote wellbeing for this population. A scoping review was conducted using a six-stage methodological framework, and is reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR statement. This explored the extent, range and nature of the peer-reviewed, published, academic literature on what is known about the protective factors that promote LGBTI+ youth wellbeing. Six databases were systematically searched applying Population–Concept–Context key inclusion criteria, complemented by contact with authors to identify additional sources, reference checks and hand searches. Ninety-six individual research records were identified and analysed, drawing from Honneth’s Recognition Theory. Interpersonal relations with parents (n = 40), peers (n = 32) and providers (n = 22) were associated with indicators of enhanced wellbeing, as were LGBTI+ community relations (n = 32). Importantly, online (n = 10), faith (n = 10) and cultural (n = 5) communities were potentially protective. Content and thematic analysis highlighted the importance of Gay–Straight Alliances (GSAs) (n = 23) offering powerful protective opportunities through intersecting interpersonal, community and legal forms of recognition. GSAs enhance allyship by peers and providers (n = 21), facilitate access to LGBTI+ community networks (n = 11) and co-exist alongside inclusive policies (n = 12), curricular (n = 5) and extracurricular activities (n = 1). This scoping review underscores the need to move beyond the predominant focus on risk factors for LGBTI+ youth, which subsequently inform protectionist approaches. It concludes with an appeal to develop mechanisms to apply recognitive justice to policy, practice and, importantly, future research directions. This emphasises the salience of enhanced understandings of inclusion, which is rights-based, universally available and of potential benefit to all.

A qualitative study to explore the healthcare-seeking experiences of men who have sex with men and transgender women in Rwanda

“…Nevertheless, as proven by countries that currently have progressive LGBTQ + laws and policies, having MSM and TGW protective legal mechanisms and social policies in Rwanda could go a long way in addressing the health inequities and social injustices faced by MSM and TGW. (30,31,32) The ndings of our study note incidences where participants left the health facilities untreated, incidences of which participants attributed to HCPs' lack of knowledge and skills on how to treat diseases common to them. This nding is consistent with the Matovu et al study in Uganda where participants stated that health workers had limited skills and knowledge in treating MSM.…”

Differentiating protective factors for transgender individuals who experience suicidality: The role of optimism as a mediator

“…LGBQ+ people. Pride has been associated with positive well-being among LGBTQ+ individuals (Ceatha et al, 2021;Rubino et al, 2018) Many LGBTQ+ communities engage in celebratory pride days, a festivity that often includes parades and increased awareness of the importance of LGBTQ+ rights within larger communities. Pride days are to recognize the first riots and people who have fought for…”

Associations between mental health and HIV status among sexual minority and heterosexual adolescents in Nigeria

“…Much of the prior research on the mental health of adolescent sexual minority individuals has focused on high-income countries outside Africa. [44][45][46][47] To date, the few studies on the mental health of sexual minority individuals in Africa have been conducted largely among adults, with a focus on men who have sex with men [48][49][50][51][52][53] . A paucity of African studies have focused on adolescent sexual minority individuals.…”