1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1986.tb01992.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective effects of ketotifen on allergen‐induced bronchoconstriction and skin weal

Abstract: Abstract. A single‐blind cross‐over method was used to investigate the effects of ketotifen on the total respiratory resistance response curve to inhalation of a high concentration of allergen (1:5 w/v house dust or 1:10 w/v Japanese cedar pollen) and the weal response to intradermal injection of serially diluted allergen (1:103–1:106 w/v). Five subjects received 2 mg of ketotifen every 12 hr for the first week and an inactive placebo in the same manner for the second week. The remaining five subjects receive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several bronchial provocation tests have demonstrated ketotifen protection against both the early and late reac tion due to allergic stimuli [19]. Ketotifen protection against the effects of non-specific bronchial challenges (particularly methacholine and exercise), on the other hand, has proved controversial [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bronchial provocation tests have demonstrated ketotifen protection against both the early and late reac tion due to allergic stimuli [19]. Ketotifen protection against the effects of non-specific bronchial challenges (particularly methacholine and exercise), on the other hand, has proved controversial [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, we have developed an apparatus [5] for inhalation challenges with methacholine [6] and house dust (HD) allergen [7], Using the apparatus, throughout both inhalation challenges, bronchial responses can be continuously and graphically evaluated as a change in total respiratory resistance (Rrs) measured with the oscillation technique [Sj. Since these two tnethods entail very little discomfort for the patients, many outpatients have undergone bronchial challenges with methacholine and allergen in our clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%