2004
DOI: 10.3201/eid1012.040684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective Effectiveness of Hantavirus Vaccine

Abstract: A case-control study in the Republic of Korea evaluated the protective effectiveness of the hantavirus vaccine. Point estimates showed increasing effectiveness with increasing numbers of doses received: 25% for one dose, 46% for two doses, and 75% for three doses. All 95% confidence intervals overlapped zero; therefore, the findings could be due to chance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…the hantavirus vaccine is questionable. 10,11 But it is impossible to conclude that the vaccinations are not associated with the severity of HFRS because (1) the sample size of this study might be small to find a benefit of vaccination on the severity of HFRS and (2) selection bias might exist; asymptomatic or mild HFRS cases might not be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…the hantavirus vaccine is questionable. 10,11 But it is impossible to conclude that the vaccinations are not associated with the severity of HFRS because (1) the sample size of this study might be small to find a benefit of vaccination on the severity of HFRS and (2) selection bias might exist; asymptomatic or mild HFRS cases might not be included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The viruses are transmitted to humans by the inhalation of excreta of rodents infected with hantaviruses (3). HFRS was first recognized during the Korean War in the early 1950s, and although a hantavirus vaccine has been developed, the disease remains a serious problem in Asia and Europe (1, 4), and especially among soldiers in Korea (5, 6). A 2006 report describes HFRS epidemiology in endemic regions in Korea during a relatively short period, 1995-1998 (7); however, an updated epidemiological study is necessary to better understand the current status of HFRS in Korea.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different vaccine strategies have been experimentally tested [72] and certain vaccine candidates have been tested in humans [73]. A suckling mouse brain-derived vaccine, Hantavax™, is available in Korea, and similar vaccines are also sold in China, however, as yet, there is no clear evidence that these vaccines protect against HFRS [74].…”
Section: Vaccines/therapeutics Currently Availablementioning
confidence: 99%