Abstract:Background:Myocardial infarction is an important cause of mortality after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Sevoflurane provides myocardial protection to patients undergoing coronary surgery, but whether it also reduces the incidence of myocardial injury in CEA patients is unclear. In this study, we evaluated the cardioprotective effect of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing CEA.Methods:This was a single-center, prospective, randomized study conducted between November 2011 and December 2013. … Show more
“…Kuzkov et al reported that sevoflurane (induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane) is better than propofol (Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol) to improve early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (31) . Wang et al results offers low-dose sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing CEA reduces the incidence of myocardial injury in symptomatic patients after CEA (32) . Tsujikawa et al reported that low-dose dexmedetomidine improves hemodynamic stability during the emergence and the recovery phases of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing CEA, in their randomized double-blind placebocontrol trial (29) .…”
Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is responsible from 20% to 25% of ischemic stroke events. Open carotid surgery and stent insertion are two main types of treatment procedures. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed under general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia (interscalen block, cervical plexus block either by landmark technique or by US guidance), combination of general and regional anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia with combination of periferic block. The aim of all anesthesic techniques is to prevent pain during the three painful periods (1. Skin incision, 2. Insertion of a retromandibular retractor, 3. Perivascular preparation) during CEA). All techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. But there is no certain data about which one is superior to other. There is no consensus on anaesthetic choice for CEA. At present regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for patients undergoing CEA is still debate topic. Improvements in medical theraphy, use of cerebral monitoring, better timing for surgery after ischemic events, better surgical techniques, increased use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia improve procedural outcomes. Despite these improvements, anaesthesia management is still deciding according to surgeon and anaesthesiologist preferences, the patient's satisfaction and the conditions in the hospitals where we work.
“…Kuzkov et al reported that sevoflurane (induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane) is better than propofol (Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol) to improve early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (31) . Wang et al results offers low-dose sevoflurane with propofol in patients undergoing CEA reduces the incidence of myocardial injury in symptomatic patients after CEA (32) . Tsujikawa et al reported that low-dose dexmedetomidine improves hemodynamic stability during the emergence and the recovery phases of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing CEA, in their randomized double-blind placebocontrol trial (29) .…”
Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is responsible from 20% to 25% of ischemic stroke events. Open carotid surgery and stent insertion are two main types of treatment procedures. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be performed under general anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia (interscalen block, cervical plexus block either by landmark technique or by US guidance), combination of general and regional anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia with combination of periferic block. The aim of all anesthesic techniques is to prevent pain during the three painful periods (1. Skin incision, 2. Insertion of a retromandibular retractor, 3. Perivascular preparation) during CEA). All techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. But there is no certain data about which one is superior to other. There is no consensus on anaesthetic choice for CEA. At present regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for patients undergoing CEA is still debate topic. Improvements in medical theraphy, use of cerebral monitoring, better timing for surgery after ischemic events, better surgical techniques, increased use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia improve procedural outcomes. Despite these improvements, anaesthesia management is still deciding according to surgeon and anaesthesiologist preferences, the patient's satisfaction and the conditions in the hospitals where we work.
“…In recent years, it has been found that pentazocine is a partial excitatoryantagonist of opioid receptors mainly agonizing κ receptors, with the same excitatory effect on δ receptors and partial antagonistic effect on µ receptors at increased doses, which, in addition to exerting good analgesic effects in clinical practice and producing little respiratory depression, can also play a myocardial protective role, but these studies are still limited to cardiac surgery and animal experiments [11] However, these studies have been limited to cardiac surgery and animal studies [11], and the myocardial protective effects of pentazocine in non-cardiac surgery have been less reported, and, in addition, some myocardial ischemia or myocardial injury may not show clinical symptoms, thus leading to missed diagnosis. The troponin (cTnI) selected in this experiment can detect even the smallest damage to myocardial injury, has very high sensitivity and speci city, and is extremely speci c for the diagnosis of myocardial injury [12,13], in addition, its detection is independent of ischemic symptoms, thus increasing sensitivity and monitoring more accurately, and has an irreplaceable position in the early identi cation of myocardial occurrence of ischemic damage.…”
BACKGROUNDː To observe the effect of Pentazocine on elderly hypertensive patients with preoperative and postoperative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentration and the occurring rate of cardiovascular events;Analysis whether Pentazocine can reduce the perioperative myocardial injury of patients with non-cardiac surgery and play a role in myocardial protection. METHODSːSelective the hip replacement under spinal anesthesia of elderly hypertensive patients of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from Nov. 2020 to June. 2021. 79 cases were randomly divided into two group :Pentazocine group (P group, n = 39), Control group (C group, n = 40);Monitor and record the blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), electrocardiogram (ECG) and intraoperative adverse cardiovascular events.With the use of ELISA to determinate the preoperative and 24h-postoperative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentrations. RESULTSː1. When compared with the moment entering the operating room, in both group, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) have significant statistical difference (P < 0.05)with the time after the surgury; the MAP, HR, SpO2 have no difference between the two groups in both of the time (P > 0.05). 2. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in P group was 10.3%(4/39), it was significantly lower than that of C group27.5%(11/40),which has significant statistical difference (P < 0.05).3. the concentrations of cTnI were not different before surgery (P > 0.05) between the two groups,the cTnI concentrations in the two groups after 24h of the surgery were both higher than those before the surgery, and the increasing range of P group was significantly lower than that in C group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONSː 1. The hip joint replacement have significant hemodynamic changes on elderly patients with hypertension and may cause different degrees of myocardial injury;2. Pentazocine can significantly reduce the impact of the damage on patients's myocardium;The myocardial protective effect may exist.
“…1,5 A relação entre o tipo de anestesia e MINS continua incerta. Enquanto um estudo mostrou uma associação do sevoflurano com taxas mais baixas de MINS em comparação ao propofol (11,7% vs. 29,0%, p = 0,018), 18 outros estudos não mostraram benefício do uso de anestésicos voláteis em relação à ocorrência de MINS. 19,20 É importante identificar pacientes em risco elevado de eventos cardíacos adversos graves, com base na avaliação pré-operatória e baixa capacidade funcional (< 4 METs).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.