2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
99
1
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
99
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with descriptive data from self-selecting respondents collected by Long Covid patient support groups, which suggest that the majority of respondents who have Long Covid developed it after their first infection [3]. However, most participants were unvaccinated when they were first infected, and being vaccinated is associated with a reduced risk of developing Long Covid following SARS-CoV-2 infection [14][15][16]. In addition, reinfections became more common following the emergence of the Omicron variant [2], and the risk of Long Covid has previously been shown to be lower for infections compatible with the Omicron variants compared with the Delta variant [17,18].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our findings are consistent with descriptive data from self-selecting respondents collected by Long Covid patient support groups, which suggest that the majority of respondents who have Long Covid developed it after their first infection [3]. However, most participants were unvaccinated when they were first infected, and being vaccinated is associated with a reduced risk of developing Long Covid following SARS-CoV-2 infection [14][15][16]. In addition, reinfections became more common following the emergence of the Omicron variant [2], and the risk of Long Covid has previously been shown to be lower for infections compatible with the Omicron variants compared with the Delta variant [17,18].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Time zero (T0) for this study was the time of positive COVID-19 laboratory test plus 28 days. This 28 day period was implemented as Long COVID is only diagnosable 28 days after COVID-19 infection [7][8][9][10]. If we did not implement this 28 day wait, then we would be artificially and uniformly increasing the time to event.…”
Section: Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, however, Long COVID is defined in many ways and not necessarily in a consistent manner [6]. One common difference in studies of Long COVID is that some studies analyze time from infection until the abatement of COVID-19 symptoms while others focus on the time to development of new Long COVID symptoms following a COVID-19 infection [7][8][9]. Another common variation among studies of Long COVID is a difference in observation window, which varies between 4 weeks to 1 year following COVID-19 infection, with further variation on whether the study period includes or starts after the recommended 28 days post-COVID-19 infection wait period before identifying a patient as having Long COVID [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are no treatments yet identified to reduce the risk of developing Long COVID. Vaccination reduces but does not eliminate the risk of Long COVID [2]. Higher acute viral load or prolonged viral shedding may be associated with increased risk of Long COVID [3, 4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%