2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection or expropriation: Politically connected independent directors in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
153
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(93 reference statements)
5
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, firms with political connections are more tax aggressive [34]. Wang (2015) empirically tests politically-connected independent directors' roles in China's listed companies and finds that, for both private and state-owned companies, the existence of this kind of independent director can lead to more related-party transactions [20].…”
Section: The Roles Of Political Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, firms with political connections are more tax aggressive [34]. Wang (2015) empirically tests politically-connected independent directors' roles in China's listed companies and finds that, for both private and state-owned companies, the existence of this kind of independent director can lead to more related-party transactions [20].…”
Section: The Roles Of Political Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first channel refers to the decision-making logic where the politically-connected board chairmen behave similarly to government officials [18] and push listed companies to invest more in ECER to achieve the government's goal. The second channel suggests that since political connection can bring resources to listed companies [19,20], companies may invest more in ECER in return. Due to the existence of these two channels, we can argue that listed companies with politically-connected board chairmen will invest more in ECERI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, central SOEs usually carry less political burdens in contracts with local SOEs (Cheung et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2012 andWang, 2015). Moreover, the incentive for using SOEs to implement political agendas is weaker for the central government than for local governments because there is no interjurisdictional competition in governments, and competition for promotion among central bureaucrats is absent.…”
Section: Central and Local Government-controlled Soesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this institutional disadvantage, non-SOEs cultivate close relationships with the government by acquiring political connections (Fan et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2015;Wang, 2015). Non-SOEs in China are often denied access to external financial markets, which deters them from carrying out value-creating projects.…”
Section: Access To External Financing Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%