2009
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpp108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of trade marks against dilution: a semiotic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the theory of dilutive harm, non-confusing uses of a famous registered mark can dilute their selling power, eventually leading to a loss of distinctive character and the demise of the mark (Schechter, 1927, p. 825). Especially within the luxury industry, consumers receive both a tangible product and an intangible added value (Assaf, 2009, p. 643). Anti-dilution protection extends the trademark protection (from anti-confusing uses) to brand communication, advertisement, and investment (Welkowitz, 2012; Kur and Senftleben, 2017, p. 183).…”
Section: Trademark Counterfeiting In Civil Litigations: Theoretical G...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the theory of dilutive harm, non-confusing uses of a famous registered mark can dilute their selling power, eventually leading to a loss of distinctive character and the demise of the mark (Schechter, 1927, p. 825). Especially within the luxury industry, consumers receive both a tangible product and an intangible added value (Assaf, 2009, p. 643). Anti-dilution protection extends the trademark protection (from anti-confusing uses) to brand communication, advertisement, and investment (Welkowitz, 2012; Kur and Senftleben, 2017, p. 183).…”
Section: Trademark Counterfeiting In Civil Litigations: Theoretical G...mentioning
confidence: 99%