2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of polymeric membranes with antifouling surfacing via surface modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(131 reference statements)
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous studies have found good candidates for this class of materials, through targeted design of functional, self‐organizing polymers specifically for this application, better performance can be achieved. The most common approaches here are to either make use of constituents that will segregate to the membrane surface or to employ post‐processing treatments …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies have found good candidates for this class of materials, through targeted design of functional, self‐organizing polymers specifically for this application, better performance can be achieved. The most common approaches here are to either make use of constituents that will segregate to the membrane surface or to employ post‐processing treatments …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, ways to decrease hydrophobicity and to increase hydrophilicity of the PVDF‐based membranes is an important aspect. Such modification techniques mainly include surface coating, surface grafting, copolymerization modification, and blend modification . Compared with other methods, blend modification has more practical significance .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The membrane process that uses pressure as a driving force such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF) have been widely used because of strong demand for a large number of industrial applications such as purification, seawater desalination, wastewater treatment and reuse, food processing and bioseparation. 5,[7][8][9][10] In addition, NF technology is reported to be efficient in the separation of organic micro-pollutants, while the main disadvantage of this technology is its high energy consumption due to the high operational pressures. 6,[11][12][13][14][15] On the other hand, the separation performance by MF and UF is limited by large pore size despite relatively lower operational pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The conventional operation of the membrane-based technology is superior to other methods such as adsorption and distillation. 6 The membrane process that uses pressure as a driving force such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF) have been widely used because of strong demand for a large number of industrial applications such as purification, seawater desalination, wastewater treatment and reuse, food processing and bioseparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%