Abstract:This report presents a comprehensive set of recommendations for protection of human beings who are trafficked for the purpose of organ removal or are targeted for such trafficking. Developed by an interdisciplinary group of international experts under the auspices of the project Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Organ Removal (also known as the HOTT project), these recommendations are grounded in the view that an individual who parts with an organ for money within an illegal scheme is ipso facto a… Show more
“…Protection of prospective transplant recipients and living donors begins during the evaluation process, which, guided by established professional norms, aims to determine their medical and psychosocial suitability for donation or transplantation, their understanding of the process, and the voluntariness of their consent, and also aims to detect signs that may indicate involvement in organ trafficking, trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal, and/or transplant tourism. 6 , 7 Such signs may include errors or discrepancies in the documentation identifying prospective donors and recipients; lack of evidence of a relationship between the prospective donor and recipient despite claims of consanguinity or close emotional relationship; social relationships between the intended donor and recipient in which the recipient (or their relative) is in a position of power over the donor (or a relative of the donor), for example, employer or work sponsor; or refusal to permit the prospective donor to speak independently with healthcare staff.…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laws governing trafficking in human organs and trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal should aim to hold those who profit from transplant-related crimes criminally accountable and to protect those who may be victims. 6 The involvement of ‘donors’ or recipients in the sale or purchase of an organ should be prohibited. However, it is for national governments to decide whether to also criminalize these persons for their involvement in these acts.…”
The 2018 Edition of the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism (DoI) provides an updated set of principles and definitions to guide policymakers and health professionals working in organ donation and transplantation. A draft of the new edition was circulated to the public and transplant professionals through an online consultation process, which also sought feedback on a draft explanatory article that explained the principles and discussed some of their practical implications. Both drafts were revised in response to feedback from participants in the consultation. We present here the discussion article, which is intended to assist stakeholders in applying the principles of the DoI by providing more detailed information about the meaning and potential implications of implementing the DoI in various contexts.
“…Protection of prospective transplant recipients and living donors begins during the evaluation process, which, guided by established professional norms, aims to determine their medical and psychosocial suitability for donation or transplantation, their understanding of the process, and the voluntariness of their consent, and also aims to detect signs that may indicate involvement in organ trafficking, trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal, and/or transplant tourism. 6 , 7 Such signs may include errors or discrepancies in the documentation identifying prospective donors and recipients; lack of evidence of a relationship between the prospective donor and recipient despite claims of consanguinity or close emotional relationship; social relationships between the intended donor and recipient in which the recipient (or their relative) is in a position of power over the donor (or a relative of the donor), for example, employer or work sponsor; or refusal to permit the prospective donor to speak independently with healthcare staff.…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laws governing trafficking in human organs and trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal should aim to hold those who profit from transplant-related crimes criminally accountable and to protect those who may be victims. 6 The involvement of ‘donors’ or recipients in the sale or purchase of an organ should be prohibited. However, it is for national governments to decide whether to also criminalize these persons for their involvement in these acts.…”
The 2018 Edition of the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism (DoI) provides an updated set of principles and definitions to guide policymakers and health professionals working in organ donation and transplantation. A draft of the new edition was circulated to the public and transplant professionals through an online consultation process, which also sought feedback on a draft explanatory article that explained the principles and discussed some of their practical implications. Both drafts were revised in response to feedback from participants in the consultation. We present here the discussion article, which is intended to assist stakeholders in applying the principles of the DoI by providing more detailed information about the meaning and potential implications of implementing the DoI in various contexts.
“…6,8 The current legislation sets rigorous and detailed rules and standards concerning brain death, as well as the removal, storage, allocation, and transplant of human tissue and organs. 16 In addition, the official Tunisian Islamic authority supports organ donation and transplant. This position is based on the Quran verses and prophet sayings and the position of other prestigious academies or personalities in the Muslim world.…”
Section: Figure 1 Patient and Graft Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations: NS, not significant ensure their success, such strategies should accommodate international recommendations [14][15][16] and local resources and also take into account cultural issues. 11,13 In our experience, the acceptance of kidney donations between spouses and among extended family members has resulted in an increase in the numbers of living donors during the last decade of this study.…”
Section: Figure 1 Patient and Graft Survivalmentioning
Objectives: The aim of this study was to report the results of 30 years of experience at the first kidney transplant center in Tunisia. Materials and Methods: All kidney transplants performed at the center between June 1986 and June 2016 were included. The study period was divided into 3 decades. Recipient and donor data and follow-up information were obtained from a local database and patient medical records. Comparative analyses were performed using the t test for continuous variables and the χ 2 test for qualitative variables. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated according to the actuarial method, and comparison of survival curves was performed according to the logrank test. Results: The mean age of recipients was 32.7 ± 11.5 years (range, 6-65 y) with a gender ratio of 2.2. Duration of prekidney transplant dialysis varied from 2 months to 20 years (median, 27.5 mo); 1.7% of patients underwent transplant preemptively. Kidneys were recovered from deceased donors in 21.2% of cases and from living donors in 78.8%. The proportion of deceased donors dropped from 27.4% during the period 2006-2010 to 12.9% during the period 2011-2015 (P < 0.04). Patient survival rates at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 96%, 89.3%, 79.5%, 71.1%, and 65.4%. Graft survival rates were 95%, 86.5%, 76.2%, 66.3%, and 57.2%. The annual graft loss was 2.9%, with a mortality rate of 2.4% and without significant differences between patients receiving deceaseddonor and living-donor organs. Conclusions: Kidney transplant activity remains suboptimal in our country. The reduction in deceaseddonor organs could be related to the political transformations facing our country with their resulting social and economic consequences. Efforts should be made to increase governmental resources and to improve both public awareness of organ donation and the motivation of transplant teams.
“…One day before the symposium, 40 experts were invited to participate in the project's Writers' Conference to formulate recommendations to improve the nonlegislative response. Convening in 4 groups, each group developed recommendations that are presented in the underlying issue: the ethical and legal obligations of health care providers, 11 the protection of persons trafficked for the purpose of organ removal, 12 strengthening cross-border collaboration in criminal cases, 13 and stimulating partnerships between transplant professionals and law enforcement. 14 Each set of recommendations represents the group's views and some contain overlap in content.…”
Over the years, the trade in human organs has become an object of international concern. Since the 1980s, antiorgan trade initiatives have mainly involved the strengthening of legislative responses. Little attention however is given to nonlegislative responses by law enforcement authorities. The HOTT project is a European Union-funded research project titled “trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal.” Its objectives are to increase knowledge, raise awareness, and improve the nonlegislative response to the crime. Its consortium organized a “Writers' Conference” in The Hague, The Netherlands at Europol's Headquarters where a group of 40 experts, consisting of transplant professionals, law enforcement officials, and policy makers, formulated recommendations to improve nonlegislative responses. These recommendations, presented hereafter, address the ethical and legal obligations of health care providers, the protection of persons trafficked for the purpose of organ removal, strengthening cross-border collaboration in criminal cases, and stimulating partnerships between transplant professionals and law enforcement. These recommendations offer ways in which transplant professionals can contribute to improving the nonlegislative response to trafficking in human beings for the purpose of organ removal.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.