1995
DOI: 10.1016/0034-5288(95)90041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of goats against rinderpest by vaccination with attenuated peste des petits ruminants virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The vaccinated animals did not develop any disease following challenge with virulent PPRV strains and thereby this vaccine was used worldwide (Africa, Middle East and Sothern Asia) for effective control of PPR. In a cross protection study, PPR vaccine was found to protect cattle effectively against RP [34]. It has been demonstrated that freeze-drying of this vaccine in an excipient containing trehalose makes it very thermostable and it resists temperature up to 45°C for a period of 14 days with minimal loss of potency [159].…”
Section: Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaccinated animals did not develop any disease following challenge with virulent PPRV strains and thereby this vaccine was used worldwide (Africa, Middle East and Sothern Asia) for effective control of PPR. In a cross protection study, PPR vaccine was found to protect cattle effectively against RP [34]. It has been demonstrated that freeze-drying of this vaccine in an excipient containing trehalose makes it very thermostable and it resists temperature up to 45°C for a period of 14 days with minimal loss of potency [159].…”
Section: Prevention and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease affects both goats and sheep; however, goats are considered more susceptible than sheep (Gargadennac and Lalanne 1942). The disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates in naïve populations (Kaukarbayevich 2009), colossal economic losses (Couacy-Hymann et al 1995), reduced production, productivity as well as high control costs (FAO 2010). PPR negatively affects livelihoods through diminished and complete loss of incomes and increased vulnerability to shocks as reported during the PPR outbreak in Kenya (FAO 2009a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RP is currently the target of an international eradication campaign (20). Sheep and goats can be infected with RPV, but only the most virulent strains show any clinical disease in these species (7,16). Because of the cross-reactive and cross-protective antibodies generated by either of these two related viruses, the normal tissue cultureadapted vaccine strain of RPV (RBOK) (37) is commonly used to vaccinate against PPR, as it is known to be both safe and clinically effective (47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%