2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection of flying vehicles against blast loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that inert particles significantly weaken the shock waves up to their suppression, which can be used to enhance the explosion safety of spacecraft(see, for example, discussion of blast mitigation onboard flying vehicles in [34,35]). In contrast, high-energy particles of metals (aluminium, magnesium) or mixtures of reactive gases with additions of these particles can be used as working media in rocket engines using hybrid and heterogeneous detonation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that inert particles significantly weaken the shock waves up to their suppression, which can be used to enhance the explosion safety of spacecraft(see, for example, discussion of blast mitigation onboard flying vehicles in [34,35]). In contrast, high-energy particles of metals (aluminium, magnesium) or mixtures of reactive gases with additions of these particles can be used as working media in rocket engines using hybrid and heterogeneous detonation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During space flights, the spacecraft instrumentation is exposed to the extremely negative impacts of radiation [1], but even more dangerous threats are directed to the cosmonaut crew, especially during long-term flights and in the case of future landings on the nearest celestial bodies, such as the Moon, Mars and asteroids. Because plans for manned flights to Mars are now often discussed in the scientific literature, the present paper considers important aspects of human safety during those expeditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a) and one additional parameter of the incident shock (for example, its strength 1 J or its amplitude 1 p  ). Here the strength 1 J of the incident shock is the static pressure ratio across it, and the amplitude 1 p  is the difference between pressures while crossing the shock (the shock overpressure which is especially important in problems of blast reflection [1,2] and corresponding structural survivability [3][4][5] problem corresponds to variation in the wedge angle  in the problem of unsteady (quasisteady) reflection of propagating shock of the same strength. Thus, the non-monotonic dependence of the mechanical loads behind reflected unsteady shock from an inclined surface appears from the non-monotonic pressure variation downstream the point of steady reflection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%