2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402630101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection against lethal influenza virus challenge by RNA interferencein vivo

Abstract: Influenza virus infection is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Current vaccination strategies and antiviral drugs provide limited protection; therefore, new strategies are needed. RNA interference is an effective means of suppressing virus replication in vitro. Here we demonstrate that treatment with small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) specific for highly conserved regions of the nucleoprotein or acidic polymerase inhibits influenza A virus replication in vivo. Delivery of these siRNAs sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
294
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
294
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With further optimization of transfection carriers and siRNAs and the use of multiple doses, siRNAs may prove to be potent inhibitors of influenza virus infection in humans. Consistent with this view, in an independent study by Tompkins et al (41) using the same siRNAs, multidoses and multiroutes of administration significantly promoted the survival of mice after lethal challenge. It is notable that similar and complementary results were obtained in these two independent studies, using different carriers, doses, strains of mice, and virus strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…With further optimization of transfection carriers and siRNAs and the use of multiple doses, siRNAs may prove to be potent inhibitors of influenza virus infection in humans. Consistent with this view, in an independent study by Tompkins et al (41) using the same siRNAs, multidoses and multiroutes of administration significantly promoted the survival of mice after lethal challenge. It is notable that similar and complementary results were obtained in these two independent studies, using different carriers, doses, strains of mice, and virus strains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…[40][41][42][43] In contrast, the therapeutic efficacy was greatly reduced if siRNAs/ shRNAs were given a few days after viral challenge. The failure to treat more established viral infections was probably due to the low in vivo transduction rate of siRNAs and plasmid-based shRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The RNAi pathway converts double-stranded RNA into siRNAs, which trigger the degradation of an mRNA with complementary sequence (31). Importantly, the RNAi pathway acts as a defense against RNA viruses in plants and some animals, leading to great reductions or complete elimination (32,33). Further, introduction of RNAi pathway proteins from Saccharomyces castellii into the naturally RNAi-null S. cerevisiae resulted in greatly decreased levels of persistently infecting L-A totivirus (26).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%