2022
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.457313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection against failure of machine-learning-based QoT prediction

Abstract: Machine learning (ML)-based methods are being widely explored to predict the quality of transmission (QoT) of a lightpath. They are expected to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio margin reserved for the lightpath, thus improving the spectrum efficiency of an optical network. However, many studies on this prediction are often based on synthetic datasets or datasets obtained from laboratories. As such, these datasets may not accurately represent the entire state space of a practical optical network, which is expos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in real-life these inputs are often not known precisely 5 , and safety design margins are imposed to guarantee that modulation format assigned to the lightpath based on predicted QoT is feasible in the field deployment. The extent of these margins depends on the available information about the network and its size, but can easily reach 2-3 dB in core networks 6 , leading to significant under-utilization of resources. Notable research effort has been recently dedicated to lowering these margins by either estimating the precise values of uncertain input parameters 7, 8, 9 or directly predicting QoT metrics using measurements from previously established lightpaths 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in real-life these inputs are often not known precisely 5 , and safety design margins are imposed to guarantee that modulation format assigned to the lightpath based on predicted QoT is feasible in the field deployment. The extent of these margins depends on the available information about the network and its size, but can easily reach 2-3 dB in core networks 6 , leading to significant under-utilization of resources. Notable research effort has been recently dedicated to lowering these margins by either estimating the precise values of uncertain input parameters 7, 8, 9 or directly predicting QoT metrics using measurements from previously established lightpaths 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only existing work that combines ML-based low-margin design and resilience in optical networks is 6 , where authors demonstrate savings from ML-based QoT-estimation for dedicated and shared protection. In this work, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, we investigate possible savings from ML-estimated design margins in 2 restoration scenarios: 1) Restoration Planning and 2) Restoration Upgrade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in reallife, PL parameters such as the EDFA gain ripple, connector loss and, sometimes, even the fiber type are not known precisely, so safety (design) margins [3] are imposed to guarantee that the MF configured based on predicted QoT is operable in the field deployment, and the correct number of transponders is installed to satisfy traffic requests. The extent of design margins depends on the available information about the network, its size and available monitoring capabilities, but, to account for the worst-case deviation of the predicted vs. the actual SNR, in presence of multiple PL uncertainties, they can easily reach up to (2)(3) dB in core networks [4], leading to significant resource under-utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, humanity demands the application of a communication system by using machine learning algorithms. The regression algorithms are more flexible, and reliable [3]. Regression algorithms can improve the accuracy and performance of fiber-optic communication and networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%