2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/254/1/012009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting subspaces by acting on the outside

Abstract: Many quantum control tasks aim at manipulating the state of a quantum mechanical system within a finite subspace of states. However, couplings to the outside are often inevitable. Here we discuss strategies which keep the system in the controlled subspace by applying strong interactions onto the outside. This is done by drawing analogies to simple toy models and to the quantum Zeno effect. Special attention is paid to the constructive use of dissipation in the protection of subspaces.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result clearly shows that the quantum Zeno effect and the dynamical decoupling can have rather different results when the operation frequency is finite, though the two methods give essentially the same results in the limit of infinite operation frequent as shown in Ref. [22][23][24].…”
Section: Concluding Remarksupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result clearly shows that the quantum Zeno effect and the dynamical decoupling can have rather different results when the operation frequency is finite, though the two methods give essentially the same results in the limit of infinite operation frequent as shown in Ref. [22][23][24].…”
Section: Concluding Remarksupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is therefore an interesting problem to study how one could protect a two-qubit state with techniques which have been demonstrated already, for example, dynamical decoupling scheme [11][12][13][14][15][16]18] which have been demonstrated experimentally recently [19][20][21]. It is well known that in the limit of infinitely frequent operations, QZE and dynamical decoupling are unified and can have the same results [22][23][24]. The two methods are not compared in the more realistic condition when the operation frequencies are finite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtle quantum effects are known to be able to populate certain states of the system selectively, while leaving others empty. [8][9][10][11][12] A canonical example is the Λ system, in which excitation can be transferred directly via a Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP) from an initial to a final ground state. 13,14 Even though these states are not directly coupled but only interact indirectly via a single excited state, this intermediate bridge does not acquire any population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid dynamics can be shown to effectively result in a quantum Zeno effect which suppresses the exchange of excitation between observed subspace. 10,11 For example, STIRAP works because the above described Λ system possesses a zero energy eigenstate. The presence of strong interactions ensures that the Λ system remains at all times in its zero eigenstate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the measurements project the system back into a finitedimensional subspace that includes the initial state, the state evolution remains confined within this subspace and the subspace can be protected against leakage of population using a quantum Zeno strategy [4,5]. An operator version of this phenomenon has also been suggested recently [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%