2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-014-9581-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting Rural Church-Going Immigrant Women from Family Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of spiritual abuse also includes limiting access to ceremonies and places of worship. Women within abusive relationships described access to church services as a means to gain support for coping with the abuse (Hancock, Ames, & Behnke, 2014). Preventing access then serves as a means for the perpetrator to control his or her partner and limit access to supportive others, but it also impacts an individual's spiritual life.…”
Section: Spiritual Abuse Of Native American Eldersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of spiritual abuse also includes limiting access to ceremonies and places of worship. Women within abusive relationships described access to church services as a means to gain support for coping with the abuse (Hancock, Ames, & Behnke, 2014). Preventing access then serves as a means for the perpetrator to control his or her partner and limit access to supportive others, but it also impacts an individual's spiritual life.…”
Section: Spiritual Abuse Of Native American Eldersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immigrant families in the United States experience a series of external or structural stressors, such as: family networks view the care of children as a shared responsibility (Cardoso, Gomez & Padilla, 2009); poverty, discrimination, linguistic and cultural barriers, and family conflict (Dettlaff, Earner, & Phillips, 2009); living with fear to deportation and losing their children are daily realities that make undocumented women (Hancock, Ames, & Behnke, 2014;Marrs, 2012); others environment determinants like: language barriers, economic distress, experiences with discrimination, and family separation (Holtrop, McNeil, & Scott, 2015); enculturation, and parental separations (Gudino, Nadeem, Kataoka & Lau, 2011).…”
Section: External Stressors Which Difficult the Acculturation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The children' self-efficacy is built while more likely of parent to engage actively in their children's academic development.Mendez and Westerberg (2012) observed that promote PEP in their children, the families can make activities like: talking about feelings, emotion recognition, learning new words, vocabulary building, shapes, colors, storytelling oral language development, narratives, alphabet connection and phonemic awareness in direction to increase the social competence, emotion expression and regulation, the creativity and imagination, the self-esteem and self-efficacy, although the parentchild warmth relation.Marrs (2012) developed an environmentally-based model intervention and prevention in three routes: (a) provide informative material, social, and educational supports, (b) provide assessments, referrals, and advocacy to improve consciousness, and (c) provide counseling and help them to express bad emotions. Which was adapted and confirmed byHancock et al (2014) with undocumented immigrant people.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Clergy have been found to be among the top resources Hispanics report they have used (or would use) if they needed help for a family problem (Bermudez, Kirkpatrick, Hecker, & Torres-Robles, 2010), in case of domestic violence, in particular among women (Hancock, Ames, & Behnke, 2014; Vaaler, 2008) and for substance abuse problems (Perron et al, 2009). Kane & Williams (2000) and Kane (2003) asked subjects whom they would seek help from (nobody, Priest, Priest with helping profession degree or lay professional) regarding 11 moral, emotional, family and personal situations, where one of the situations was “personal alcohol abuse.” In the first study Anglos were found to be more likely to seek help from a layperson credentialed in a helping profession while Hispanics preferred Priests (with or without credentials) in all the situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%