Protecting Market Identity: When and How Do Organizations Respond to Consumers’ Devaluations?

Abstract

This article examines the conditions under which organizations publicly respond to unfavorable consumer evaluations that challenge their market identity. Because organizations' market identities are certified by expert evaluations, consumers' devaluations that challenge these expert evaluations represent an identity threat. However, organizations do not always react to consumers' devaluations because of the risks associated to public responses. Hence, we first predict that organizations are more likely to respond to severe devaluations than to weaker ones; second, we propose that organizations, when faced with severe devaluations, are more likely to craft responses that justify their actions and behaviors. We further contend that, for any market identity under consideration, an organization's reputation amplifies these relationships. Analyses of a dataset of London hoteliers' responses to online reviews posted on TripAdvisor during the period 2002-2012 lend substantial support to our hypotheses.

Future applications of blockchain in business and management: A Delphi study

“…Blockchain techniques may offer a mechanism for collating and verifying audit information. Verified consumer reviews . Online reviews of places and products have grown in use and popularity but have been lambasted for their inability to distinguish between genuine and falsified reporting (Scott & Orlikowski, ; Wang, Wezel, & Forgues, ). The multiple independent verification process within blockchain may afford some greater degree of trustworthiness of consumer reviews. Verified corporate due diligence .…”

Is India Ready for e-Mobility? An Exploratory Study to Understand e-Vehicles Purchase Intention

“…Cost of ownership items was adopted from Delang & Cheng [39] whereas Infrastructure support items were taken from Krupa et al [54] and She et al [52]. Purchase intention was measured using scale adapted from Hidrue et al [51] and Wang et al [55]. All items were measured using a five-point Likert-type response format, with "strongly disagree" and "strongly agree" as anchors.…”

Crowd-Driven Competitive Intelligence: Understanding the Relationship Between Local Market Competition and Online Rating Distributions

“…Given the ease and scale of data available on Yelp and other similar sources, a range of studies (e.g., Wang et al 2016, Anderson and Magruder 2012, Lu et al 2013, Kovacs et al 2014 now consider a business's online mean rating as a good control variable and, conceivably, implicitly assume it as a proxy for market power. For a study that includes mean ratings of businesses from across markets and uses them in a manner where the relative standing among businesses matters, it is critical to examine if the local market competition poses a threat of confounding the results.…”