2014
DOI: 10.1038/nphys3050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protecting a spin ensemble against decoherence in the strong-coupling regime of cavity QED

Abstract: Hybrid quantum systems based on spin ensembles coupled to superconducting microwave cavities are promising candidates for robust experiments in cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) and for future technologies employing quantum mechanical e ects [1][2][3][4] . At present, the main source of decoherence in these systems is inhomogeneous spin broadening, which limits their performance for the coherent transfer and storage of quantum information [5][6][7] . Here we study the dynamics of a superconducting cavity st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
216
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
216
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This form for ρ(ω) was established in our previous studies by a careful comparison with the experiment [29,36]. The right column shows that two holes were burnt into ρ(ω) at frequencies ωs ± Ω (two arrows in the inset) to suppress decoherence [26,27] Ω R ≈ 2Ω, and the total decoherence rate, Γ, mostly determined by the dephasing caused by the inhomogeneous broadening of the spin ensemble [36].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This form for ρ(ω) was established in our previous studies by a careful comparison with the experiment [29,36]. The right column shows that two holes were burnt into ρ(ω) at frequencies ωs ± Ω (two arrows in the inset) to suppress decoherence [26,27] Ω R ≈ 2Ω, and the total decoherence rate, Γ, mostly determined by the dephasing caused by the inhomogeneous broadening of the spin ensemble [36].…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, as was demonstrated in [26,29,37], the Volterra equation also governs quantum spin-cavity dynamics for the particular case when all spins are initially in the ground state and the cavity contains initially a single photon. Therefore, we take the amplitude of the write pulses, η (W ) |0/1 (t), such that the net power injected into the cavity corresponds to the power of a coherent driving signal with an amplitude equal to the cavity decay rate, κ.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By varying M, we are able to control a delay in the onset of the superradiant emission [25] and we report the first experimental observation of a log dependence of this delay when the pseudospin is near quasiequilibrium at M ¼ S. This log dependence is consistent with predictions from the Tavis-Cummings model. We also observe an abrupt π-phase shift in the pseudospin microwave emission around this fully inverted state M ¼ S. Observations of the log dependence in the delay and the abrupt phase shift near full pseudospin inversion has eluded previous implementations of strongly coupled spin ensembles due to their much shorter T Ã 2 and the low fidelity of their pseudospin rotations (a direct consequence of nonuniform spin-cavity coupling) [26,27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Since the magnetic transition frequency of NV is about 2π × 2.8 GHz, we require a microwave cavity with ω r = 2π × 2.8 GHz. The decay rate γ of |m s = ±1 of the ground state triplet has been measured to vary from a few MHz [52,53] to 0.01Hz [54][55][56]. Our setup with practical parameters γ = 10 −3 κ i , κ ex = 10κ i and G = 0.1κ i , using a low-Q factor cross microstrip resonator with Q = 100 [41][42][43], yields κ i /2π = 28 MHz, and can provide a sensitivity of ∆B SP √ τ total 5.2 nT/ √ Hz for a single-photon probe field.…”
Section: Discussion Of Experimental Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%