2016
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protected areas and imperilled endemic freshwater biodiversity in the Western Ghats Hotspot

Abstract: 1. Fresh waters and their resources continue to be one of the most imperilled ecosystems on Earth, yet very little emphasis has been placed on identifying and developing in situ conservation mechanisms, such as freshwater protected areas. In the southern region of the Western Ghats Hotspot, India, a globally important eco-region harbouring unique freshwater taxa, there has been very little effort to identify the role played by terrestrial protected areas in freshwater biodiversity conservation.2. Around 130 sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of PAs in conserving freshwater biodiversity is uncertain, as freshwater biodiversity continues to decline despite the increase in the extent of PAs over recent years (Collen et al, ; Hermoso, Abell, Linke, & Boon, ). In addition, the PAs at present do not adequately cover inland aquatic habitats and species (Holland et al, ; Nogueira et al, ; Raghavan, Das, Nameer, Bijukumar, & Dahanukar, ; Thieme et al, ). Our framework could help to protect 80% of the threatened species (17 out of 21) within the study area if the identified priority areas are included in existing PAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of PAs in conserving freshwater biodiversity is uncertain, as freshwater biodiversity continues to decline despite the increase in the extent of PAs over recent years (Collen et al, ; Hermoso, Abell, Linke, & Boon, ). In addition, the PAs at present do not adequately cover inland aquatic habitats and species (Holland et al, ; Nogueira et al, ; Raghavan, Das, Nameer, Bijukumar, & Dahanukar, ; Thieme et al, ). Our framework could help to protect 80% of the threatened species (17 out of 21) within the study area if the identified priority areas are included in existing PAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor spatial coverage of protected areas in the Tropical Andes in covering habitats for freshwater fishes is probably because most protected areas have not been designed with freshwater biodiversity in mind. Similar problems have been identified for freshwater species elsewhere (Carrizo et al, 2017;Chessman, 2013;Darwall et al, 2011;Herbert et al, 2010;Hermoso, Filipe, Segurado, & Beja, 2015b;Lawrence et al, 2011;Raghavan, Das, Nameer, Bijukumar, & Dahanukar, 2016). If the effective conservation of freshwater fishes is a goal of current conservation frameworks in the Tropical Andes, protected areas need to be designed and managed specifically for freshwater species (Chessman, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although some populations of RLTBs are protected inside National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries, others (e.g. entire populations of S. chalakkudiensis ) remain outside the protected area network (Raghavan, Das, Nameer, Bijukumar, & Dahanukar, ). In order to allow RLTBs to mature before they are collected for trade, a minimum size limit of 110 mm needs to be set, which is greater than the mean length at first maturity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%