2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteases, proteasomes and apoptosis: breaking Ub is hard to do

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence suggests that proteasome inhibitors prevent apoptosis in various settings (4,20,25,46,47,50), while other data indicate that proteasome inhibitors, either alone or in combination with death-inducing stimuli, cause apoptosis (1,22,42,50). Specifically, proteasome inhibitors are effective in killing cancer cells while sparing normal cells (1,47,50). Our results demonstrate that in renal cells proteasome inhibitors protect antiapoptotic proteins from proteasome-mediated degradation, which leads to cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence suggests that proteasome inhibitors prevent apoptosis in various settings (4,20,25,46,47,50), while other data indicate that proteasome inhibitors, either alone or in combination with death-inducing stimuli, cause apoptosis (1,22,42,50). Specifically, proteasome inhibitors are effective in killing cancer cells while sparing normal cells (1,47,50). Our results demonstrate that in renal cells proteasome inhibitors protect antiapoptotic proteins from proteasome-mediated degradation, which leads to cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The proteasome system is known to control levels of the Bcl-2 family of proteins (6,16,36,50), so part of this protective mechanism in LLC-PK 1 cells might be mediated by Mcl-1 accumulation due to proteasome inhibition. Evidence suggests that proteasome inhibitors prevent apoptosis in various settings (4,20,25,46,47,50), while other data indicate that proteasome inhibitors, either alone or in combination with death-inducing stimuli, cause apoptosis (1,22,42,50). Specifically, proteasome inhibitors are effective in killing cancer cells while sparing normal cells (1,47,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From previous reports, several pro-apoptotic factors and signaling pathways have been shown to be involved in ER stress-induced cell death, including calpain, Cysteine aspartyl protease (caspase-4) (human), caspase-12 (murine), CHOP/GADD153, TRAF2, ASK-1, JNK, and pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members, among others. [7][8][9][10] In many instances, caspases have been implicated in this cell death pathway, on the grounds that broadspectrum caspase inhibitors block cell death. In some cases, however, cell death is not fully blocked by caspase inhibitors, suggesting that caspase-independent mechanisms may contribute to the execution of ER stress-induced cell death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 This is highlighted by several manuscripts in this issue. [9][10][11][12][13] However, the most striking example of the involvement of the UPS in apoptosis is provided by the fact that some apoptosisrelated proteins contain domains with E3-like activity owing to a unique C-terminal RING domain, as elegantly described by Vaux, and Silke 9 and in the Swiss-German humour of Pascal Meier. 10 These are the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family of proteins, including XIAP, c-IAP-1 and c-IAP-2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%