2011
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthetic finger phalanges with lifelike skin compliance for low-force social touching interactions

Abstract: BackgroundProsthetic arms and hands that can be controlled by the user's electromyography (EMG) signals are emerging. Eventually, these advanced prosthetic devices will be expected to touch and be touched by other people. As realistic as they may look, the currently available prosthetic hands have physical properties that are still far from the characteristics of human skins because they are much stiffer. In this paper, different configurations of synthetic finger phalanges have been investigated for their ski… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower Shore durometer value corresponds to a softer material. The materials were selected based on their usage in earlier works on prosthetic or robotic skins [28,29], embedding materials for tactile sensors [30,31] and for soft robotics [32,33]. All the skin samples were fabricated using standard moulding techniques.…”
Section: B Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower Shore durometer value corresponds to a softer material. The materials were selected based on their usage in earlier works on prosthetic or robotic skins [28,29], embedding materials for tactile sensors [30,31] and for soft robotics [32,33]. All the skin samples were fabricated using standard moulding techniques.…”
Section: B Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strain energy function, U, defined in Storakers [16] for highly compressible elastomers was used to describe the hyperelastic behaviour of the synthetic materials. This has been found to achieve good fits on the experimental data of synthetic materials [14] and it was likewise implemented in a human fingertip model in [17] and a 3D model of a finger phalange in [18]. The function is given as:…”
Section: B Indentation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The synthetic skins were assumed to behave with hyperelastic and viscoelastic properties [18,19]. As such, the total stress was made equivalent to the sum of the hyperelastic (HE) stress and the viscoelastic (VE) stress such that: 2 where t is the time.…”
Section: Materials Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding these tactile sensors in soft, synthetic skins have been reported to give many advantages. Among these include skin compliance for better robotic grasping and manipulation [6][7][8][9]; skin conformance for curvature, shape or object recognition [10][11][12][13]; adding fingerprint-like designs on the skin to localize contact information for roughness or texture detection [14][15][16][17]; and soft skin properties for social acceptance in human-robot interaction [18][19][20]. Given these benefits, it is evident that the mechanical behaviour of the artificial skins should be understood for a EFFECTS OF THE ARTIFICIAL SKIN'S THICKNESS ON on the transducers, whereas the whole tactile system involves the equally important modules of the skin, data transmission, conditioning and data interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%