1988
DOI: 10.1016/0315-0860(88)90047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthaphaeresis revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UWB radar emits a sinusoidal signal (the carrier signal) with a frequency f U represented byA false( t false) = Xcos false( 2 π fU t false) The motor vibrates with a specific characteristic frequency f MS (modulating signal) represented byB false( t false) = Ycos false( 2 π f MS t false) As per the characteristic of microwave signals, amplitude modulated by a mechanically oscillating object in the signal path between a transmitter and receiver [14], so, the A ( t ) is amplitude modulated with B ( t ) and the resultant signal is given byright leftthickmathspace.5emC ( t ) = ][1 + B false( t false) A ( t ) = A ( t ) + A ( t)0.1pt B ( t ) By using prosthaphaeresis identities [15, 16], C ( t ) can be shown to be the sum of three sine waves, given byC false( t false) = Xcos false( 2 π fU t false) + XY 2 cos 2 π ( fU + f normalMS ) t + cos 2 π ( fU f normalMS ) t Therefore, the modulated signal has three components, i.e. the high‐frequency carrier wave A ( t ) and two pure sine waves (sidebands) with frequencies slightly above and below the carrier frequency.…”
Section: Framework Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UWB radar emits a sinusoidal signal (the carrier signal) with a frequency f U represented byA false( t false) = Xcos false( 2 π fU t false) The motor vibrates with a specific characteristic frequency f MS (modulating signal) represented byB false( t false) = Ycos false( 2 π f MS t false) As per the characteristic of microwave signals, amplitude modulated by a mechanically oscillating object in the signal path between a transmitter and receiver [14], so, the A ( t ) is amplitude modulated with B ( t ) and the resultant signal is given byright leftthickmathspace.5emC ( t ) = ][1 + B false( t false) A ( t ) = A ( t ) + A ( t)0.1pt B ( t ) By using prosthaphaeresis identities [15, 16], C ( t ) can be shown to be the sum of three sine waves, given byC false( t false) = Xcos false( 2 π fU t false) + XY 2 cos 2 π ( fU + f normalMS ) t + cos 2 π ( fU f normalMS ) t Therefore, the modulated signal has three components, i.e. the high‐frequency carrier wave A ( t ) and two pure sine waves (sidebands) with frequencies slightly above and below the carrier frequency.…”
Section: Framework Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using prosthaphaeresis identities [38,39], Z t shows the sum of three sine wave Z t = Acos 2π f UWB t…”
Section: Handheld Doppler Uwb Radar Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UWB radar emits a sinusoidal signal (consider carrier signal) with a frequency fUWB represented as Xfalse(tfalse)=Acos)(2πfUWBt The motor vibrates with a specific characteristic frequency fnormalM (modulating signal) represented as Y)(t=Bcos)(2πfnormalMt As per the characteristic of microwave signal, amplitude modulated by a mechanically oscillating object in the signal path between a transmitter and receiver [17], therefore, the X)(t is amplitude modulated with Y)(t and resultant signal is right leftthickmathspace.5emZt=1+Yt×X(t)=Xt+Xt×Y(t) Using prosthaphaeresis identities [38, 39], Z)(t shows the sum of three sine wave right leftthickmathspace.5emZt=Acos2πfUWBt+AB2[cos2π)(fUWB+fnormalMt]+cos2π)(fUWBfnormalMtthickmathspace Therefore, the modulated signal has three components such as the carrier wave X…”
Section: Handheld Doppler Uwb Radar Signal Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foremost major advocate for scientific computation using mechanical calculating machines in the early twentieth century, Leslie Comrie, argued that careful examination of the errors in tables strongly indicated that most of these new sets of them simply were taken, usually with no attribution, from sixteenth-and seventeenth-century tables. 4 The upsurge of mathematical astronomy in early modern Europe, most associated with Nicolas Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, and Johannes Kepler, spurred the development of new methods for performing laborious calculations, particularly techniques for abridging multiplication by some sort of reduction to addition (Thoren 1988). While the first widespread techniques involved trigonometric identities, John Napier devised the more straightforward technique of logarithms early in the seventeenth century.…”
Section: Calculation "By Hand"mentioning
confidence: 99%